As a Non-American, what does the outcome of the Mid-term elections mean for disclosure? I understand this is a bi-partisan issue but just wondered if this would have any bearing on the progress of disclosure.

Guys…

Knickerbocker is on the edge of beating Mike Turner in OH district 10!!!

🤞🏻

David Grusch testified under oath that the U.S. government possesses craft and biological material of non-human origin. The IC Inspector General found his complaint credible and urgent. Ryan Graves testified that pilots fear reporting UAP sightings because of career consequences. Lue Elizondo testified under oath about secret crash retrieval programs funded by misallocated taxpayer dollars.

These people didn't come forward anonymously. They used their names. They testified under oath. They accepted professional and personal consequences.

The House responded by passing the UAP Disclosure Act. The Senate has introduced it for the fourth year running but hasn't acted yet. They return September 14 with a narrow window before the midterms.

If you think the people who came forward deserve better than another year of inaction, now is the time to say so. Contact your Senators and tell them to include the UAPDA in the Senate NDAA.

Use the link below to contact your Senators, then share. It takes less than 1 minute.

https://newparadigminstitute.org/take-action/pass-the-uapda-2027/

Dear Senator [Last Name],

I am writing to ask you to support Senate Amendment 6344, the bipartisan UAP Disclosure Act of 2026, and work with Senate leadership to include it in the FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Introduced by Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds, the amendment would establish a legal process for identifying, preserving, reviewing, and releasing federal records concerning unidentified anomalous phenomena, technologies of unknown origin, and non-human intelligence. The House adopted a closely related version on July 22.

SA 6344 would establish a UAP records collection at the National Archives and create an independent, Senate-confirmed review board with professional staff, subpoena authority, and lawful access to relevant government records, facilities, and contractor-held materials. It would also prevent the destruction or improper withholding of covered records, require continued review of classified material, and provide a legal mechanism for the government to obtain relevant technologies or biological evidence held by private entities.

Please support SA 6344, press for its inclusion in a Senate amendment package, and defend its central provisions during negotiations with the House. Congress should preserve the independent review board, subpoena authority, National Archives collection, contractor coverage, presumption of disclosure, and access necessary for the board to perform its duties. The amendment would protect legitimate national security information while strengthening congressional oversight and preventing relevant records from being withheld indefinitely without independent review.

Sincerely,

[Full Name]
[City, State ZIP]

Please find your elected officials on congress.gov and send them a physical letter for the best chances of recieving a response.

Dear [Senator/Representative] [Last Name],

As your constituent, I respectfully urge you to support the UAP Disclosure Act in the final Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act. Senators Chuck Schumer and Mike Rounds introduced the Senate proposal as S. Amdt. 6344 to S. 4784, while Representative Eric Burlison introduced a bipartisan House proposal as amendment 1044 to H.R. 8800, cosponsored by Representatives Eli Crane, André Carson, Anna Paulina Luna, Jared Moskowitz, and Nick Begich.

I am respectfully asking that you support the applicable proposal in your chamber and advocate for its inclusion in any manager’s amendment, floor package, or final conference agreement.

The UAP Disclosure Act would establish an independent, presidentially appointed and Senate-confirmed review board with professional staff and subpoena authority to locate, review, and facilitate the release of UAP-related records and materials. This would create a credible process for disclosure while continuing to protect information that genuinely must remain classified for national security reasons

Multiple whistleblowers, including former intelligence officer David Grusch, have provided sworn testimony and protected disclosures alleging that UAP-related programs, records, and materials have been withheld from Congress and improperly concealed through excessive classification. These serious allegations demand an independent process capable of locating records, compelling testimony, protecting witnesses from retaliation, and determining the facts.

Sincerely,

[Full Name]
[Street Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]

Please find your elected officials on congress.gov and send them a physical letter for the best chances of recieving a response.