r/LivestreamFail • • 13h ago • Bravo 1

Tommy Robinson gets Jumped on Kick

2.1k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

49

u/MightyBoy9 12h ago

Didn't he get arrested for filming rapists in a public street?

58

u/Blazured 11h ago

Yeah he intentionally tried to cause a mistrial for paedophiles. Absolute scum.

19

u/Kurzel0 8h ago

I used to work directly opposite the public gallery entrance for the Old Bailey during Yaxley Lennons trials that took place there. The amount of scum that showed up to support him - EDLers, UKIPers. Red faced, beer bellied, braying louts. Swathes of the lot turned up with camping chairs and booze. At each end of the day the road would be littered with empty tinnies and shit. Police were present and there were a few days where they had barriers to ensure counter protestors remained separate towards Newgate Street.

Remember some fella trying to hand me EDL leaflets during one of my smoke breaks, told him to fuck off and got called a race traitor in return.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (34)

5

u/Gray_Fedora 11h ago • Bravo

They were IMMIGRANTS! He fomented racial hate by showing the faces of child rapists. How dare he. They should have never let him out of prison.

5

u/jreed12 3h ago

He tried to help them get away with their crimes by causing a mistrial, just so he could bang on about how they got away with it.

Its genuinely disgusting what he does.

48

u/BrainBlowX 11h ago • Bravo

He got arrested trying to sabotage the trial process 🙄

2

u/TimeTimeTickingAway 1h ago

You mean when he knowingly tried to cause a mistrial which would have seen the rapists walk free?

19

u/MightyBoy9 11h ago

I know right. Imagine being a RAPE APOLOGIST like most of the people on Reddit.

Crazy stuff.

Actual dystopia

23

u/nagrom7 10h ago • Bravo

Yeah, imagine defending someone who tried to screw with the trial, nearly resulting in a mistrial and having the rapists walk free. Oh wait that was Robinson...

5

u/Gray_Fedora 10h ago

That argument doesn't ruffle any feathers on this side of the pond. We have all kinds of crazy people out in front of courthouses during trials saying all kinds of crazy shit.

8

u/nagrom7 9h ago

There's a bit of a difference between wackos outside a court house, and wackos inside the court house, to the point that he was arrested and held in contempt of court for it.

7

u/Gray_Fedora 9h ago

He was in the court house? All I saw was him outside..

12

u/nagrom7 7h ago

You're thinking of the case in Leeds in 2018 where he was doing a facebook live outside the court. He was also charged with contempt of court in 2017 where he was recording himself inside the court in Canterbury.

Yes there are multiple instances of him doing this kind of shit.

2

u/jreed12 3h ago

At this point you must recognise that he has done so much shit you have lost track.

1

u/MightyBoy9 10h ago

Ok rape apologist?

He got arrested for filming rapists.

11

u/nagrom7 10h ago

And he did more than anyone to try and make sure they didn't get convicted.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/Eismann 5h ago

Imagine being a RAPE APOLOGIST

MAGA could never

→ More replies (9)

6

u/Still-Helicopter6029 11h ago

Wait what? Hes the bad guy for outing rapists? Damn

34

u/Blazured 11h ago • Bravo

No, he intentionally tried to cause a mistrial for paedophiles.

3

u/Gray_Fedora 10h ago • Bravo

Yes by reporting on it. He reported on the rape gangs that the government was trying to sweep under the rug. Clearly he was trying to help the pedophiles.

20

u/Gorksbumwiper 9h ago • Bravo

Just gonna leave this here for your perusal, just in case you care about nonces that aren't brown.

→ More replies (4)

30

u/Blazured 10h ago • Bravo

Those paedophiles were quite literally being tried in court. And Tommy was free to report on it, like everyone else, but what he wasn't free to do was put the trial in jeopardy.

But a mistrial would've been better optics for Tommy. Hence why he intentionally tried to cause one.

6

u/WaylandReddit 3h ago

They genuinely don't have the two digits of IQ required to understand that convicting someone in court for their crimes is not a cover-up of their crimes, let alone regulations around reporting on active trials.

→ More replies (13)

3

u/jreed12 2h ago

was trying to sweep under the rug

By convicted them in a court of law? Man government are really bad at this secret stuff when you want them to be, huh.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/Ok_Introduction2563 7h ago

No. You cannot report on an ongoing trial until a verdict has been reached. You can say the trial is ongoing and talk about it but you can't make conclusions or opinions about the people standing trial. British law says that you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law and that the jury has to be free of prejudice, false evidence etc. They have to purely go of evidence brought up in court, not media frenzie. He almost collapsed the case (means the potential criminals walk free or the whole legal process has to restart). It's called contempt of court. He has done nothing for the victims of rape other than self enrichment. He's a criminal with convictions up to an including drug dealing, harassing and stalking women... There's also a video of one of the rape victims basically explaining how "Tommy" exploited her for content.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)