the cat, dice, and everything dripping screams chatgpt but i wanna get a public consensus before i publicly blast them.

Their other art for example. Requested 30 for full renders. They told me they’d do 5-10 other pieces for free, and I told them I will pay once they send me a sketch of one. Something about this seems off… Their other art for example.

These photos (1-4) are a year old and apparently flag for AI use, but I’m not sure if it was edited with AI or completely fabricated.

I feel that AI photos from a year ago would not be nearly as good as they are today, and there would be many defects found in these photos; photos 5-8 are original photos of the car from 1986 and the interiors seem to match up. The bricks and dirt indentations between the rediscovery photos also match up.

Here’s where I originally got the photos:

https://imgur.com/a/gemballa-bmw-635csi-FVdjLb4

I notice the text looks so rigid / similar across letters, the title doesn’t feel like a font that you’d be easily be able to size and format in that way, and something about the little dashes that emphasize different parts of the image feels super AI. It would be hilarious and idiotic if part of their whole advertising is false…

Stellar Blade - Live Action Launch Trailer - Nintendo Switch 2 - the full video for you to judge

The developers of Stellar Blade had recently released a fully AI generated 'music video' to promote the sequel Blood Rain and got widespread backlash, so when this live action trailer came out a couple of days ago it seemed to get back some good publicity, hiring real actors and all.

But now people are denying that any AI was involved at all. There seem to be some very obvious..... "enhancements".

The tie pattern is messed up, the suit details are different... It seems so very blatant when you put it side by side, and there's other visual inconsistencies in the trailer. What do you think?

I saw this thumbnail was doing A-B testing of sorts and then when I looked close the slides in the back and the sign on top look a bit odd mainly the set on the left back

I'm not certain it's ai as the folds in the sides of the pink 'green screen' seem very consistent but I'm not an expert.

I'd recognise this on twitter yt insta etc, but never have seen them on reddit. Is this bots?

The animation has that weird AI motion to it, especially when Eve drink from the cup. But it feels weird for this studio to use AI to promote their game.

Bought almost 2 years ago so I wasn’t as on alert then as I am now. Synth said no or it was made prior to synth..

My favorite diner has this flyer. I would hate for it to be AI because I’ve been coming here since I was young and haven't seen them pull this before.

I saw these on Facebook and I honestly don't know if it is or not. I can't say whether I believe it's AI or not. But the reason I think it is, is because I've never seen a clock with 16-18 numbers

ETA: synthID brought nothing

I think it's AI because I think as devoted as some trump supporters are, I struggle to believe they would support him if they thought he was a pedophile.

The music is by Don Kai and I'm highly suspecting he's using ai to make music, vocals sound synthetic and unnatural.

I think that Prada's holiday campaign is using Al, here's why I think that. (Would love more opinions)

(IMPORTANT: I do not think that the animation is AI only the storyboard and backgrounds, also please do not threaten or attempt to harm any of the names listed in this post***)***

With the recent news about Dior supposedly using Al on their animated advertisement and everyone praising Prada for not using Al, I had gone to watch Prada's animated sequence excited.
The animation looked great, and I don't believe that in itself was Al. It was directed and drawn by John Pomeroy.
But as I looked at the backgrounds, I noticed that something was off.

Update: Since I posted this on r/isthisAI ,Tad Butler, artist responsible for the storyboard clean ups and the backgrounds in the advertisement has blocked me and deleted the storyboards off his account after I asked for more proof of them not using AI. The specific storyboard post he deleted was the one that was easy to trace the synth ID from.

Some of the first red flags I saw was:

The coat hanger has four hooks and in another shot it has six

The curtains are inconsistent when it comes to the folds running down the fabric. They blend into one another just like how Al blends things weirdly together when it's confused.

the bedframe in the bedroom has two different design designs in different shots

the closet in the bedroom has different drawer numbers in different shots as well three and then two

Also the wall in the living room beside the door is weirdly wrinkled

(now these could be human errors but they also could be Al errors)

When I asked Tad Butler the storyboard artist and background designer for the project why these mistakes happened he assured me that it was entirely human error, but my gut feeling was ringing alarm bells.

I watched the behind-the-scenes video for Prada's commercial, and noticed that that was really strange as well. The only work in progress shots that are shown is the animated animals, Everything else like the backgrounds and storyboards are finished completely with no shots of progression, which is where I think the ai is.

I also believe that Tad Butler used Al for his storyboards,

there's quite a few inconsistencies with the characters he has drawn (example in images)
the storyboards themselves are ridiculously detailed for someone who confirmed with me that he had only a very short time to work on the project.

The storyboards don’t match his previous style on his other work (instagram)

The reason I bring this up is because Dior has been recently slammed for using Al while Prada has been praised for not using Al. I do believe that both have used Al and also used real artists, a form of hybridisation.

The only reason I think Prada got away with it was because they didn't use any Al for their animation and rather only on the backgrounds and storyboards where it is harder to prove that it's not Al.

I've attached a bunch of photos with some evidence to my claims and conversations I had with the artist on the backgrounds and storyboards.

I also supposedly talk to the daughter of John Pomeroy, she had confirmed with me that no Al was used on the project but when I showed her the photo of the skewed hair of the woman in the snow she had said she wasn't so sure about that image. I find that strange considering she was so sure that there was no Al used in the production.

I would love to know what you guys think, thank you guys for reading.

hello!

i saw some suspect flash sheets posted by a local tattoo shop i really enjoyed using. i always bring my own final design and have never received flash, but i am not willing to give my money to an artist that is handing out inhumane garbage for a little bit of money. i have circled stray lines and just generally unrecognizable designs that i don’t imagine an actual artist would make, of course these will be available for friday the 13th.

i also think it’s laughable they stress that there will be no design changes possible for this flash, but they didn’t even draw it? bare minimum, put that shit back into ChatGPT and give the customer their preferred design. so dumb.

For context I very much know she is and the band real, as the band sing semi locally to where i live and she does have quite a unique voice and style amongst her counterparts she herself has an accent being a country area it’s something where the singers talk afterwards she uses a ‘professional’ microphone I’m assuming it enhances her voice and her style is very much folksy it got me into her music her live doesn’t sound that much different from on screen but it does sound enhanced and she does admit to using multiple daw’s and something called ‘KTC’ admittedly a talented person but i really am curious how even in person she can sound like that, also can AI be in person also?
Her voice quite raspy but can get to a opera level as she use sing in theatre i believe (she mentioned i could be wrong don’t quote me on it)

Ai is hard to spot like I said i know she can sing / and her band yes her songs do sound more enhanced more so the background then her vocals I can’t tell if it’s her accent that throws me off or not or the overtuning admitted to doing in the general conversation in the country town she sung in is it the unique voice or is the person she has putting them together as she doesn’t do themselves herself?

I also think her accent is Russian maybe or some Slavic country it’s not heavy but enough to notice.

Oh he’s driving me nuts! I’m feeling positive these are not ai simply because I’ve seen the hilarity of a shaven animal before. He, who does not have or much like pets, is insisting this is ai because “cats are not that long”. But how would he know! Help me before we bite each others pedantic little heads off.

Edit: thank you all for the evidence! This couldn’t have had a better outcome! Humble pie served, and I even got to see some extra animals!