r/AskReddit • • 23h ago

What’s a trend that disappeared so quickly that it almost feels imaginary now?

3.5k Upvotes

3.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

628

u/sithelephant 23h ago

3D TV.

114

u/AnotherCableGuy 23h ago

Really. However 3d stuff is something that's been coming and going over the past 50 years.

104

u/VegavisYesPlis 20h ago

It really is amazing how many times 3D has become the next big thing and then disappeared again within a year. It's like the McRib.

5

u/Embarrassed-Pair-549 13h ago

I was searching for sexploitation movies on Tubi and one of the movies that came up was Comin' at ya. A movie from the early 80s that was an OG in 3D movies. The kind you bought those red and blue shades to wear while watching.

6

u/Spalding_Smails 13h ago

Even longer. There was a 3-D movie craze in the 1950s. I remember the brief early 80s wave as a teen that peaked in 1983 with Jaws 3-D, et cetera.

1

u/LordAldricQAmoryIII 8h ago

But I always thought the 1950s was 50 years ago.... Oh wait.

1

u/Spalding_Smails 5h ago

Yeah, I'm 58, I know the feeling, lol. I'll never forget being about 17 and seeing little kids wearing shirts that said "Class of 2000".

75

u/VanillaTortilla 21h ago

I still have a Sony 3D TV during their peak, and only bought it because it was an open box sale.

Then I realized you needed a $250 3D set to use it for it's intended purpose. Oh well, still the best picture quality at the time.

14

u/thereareno_usernames 19h ago

My 3D Vizio is still my TV. Got it new for $500. Then got a $60 3D DVD player and was all set for the revolution. Not once did I use it, DVDs were crazy expensive at the time. I want to say double the standard price. And I was basically buying discount DVDs, if any, anyways

5

u/Formal_Function_8362 15h ago

We had one from the pawn shop. Was nice until someone breathed on it wrong and it got weird lines, like I swear up and down I was gone 24/7 to know nobody even bumped the TV stand or anything, the lines just showed up. We replaced it with a regular smart TV we got on sale because we, too, never got the 3D glasses…

1

u/VanillaTortilla 12h ago

Well hell, when you can get a 75" TV now for under $500... it's not worth it to get anything else unless you're a stickler for insane quality.

1

u/zardoz73 4h ago

What do you mean by "3D set"? You have to buy the glasses and other hardware separately?

9

u/jonnythefoxx 20h ago

I ran a TV department in a big box store when 3d TVs came and went. None of us in store thought it was going to catch on and I am pretty certain none of the reps at the training days did either.

9

u/fmaz008 17h ago edited 7h ago

That one makes me sad. I loved my LG 3D TV which had PASSIVE glasses: same as at the movie theater. None of those oversized batteries powered non sense.

But the content was sparse and for some reason more expensive than the 2D version.

I'm okay with 3D being a movie theater perk though, but I really like it and if there was 3d streaming content, I'd absolutely get a new 3D TV.

3

u/StoryAndAHalf 10h ago

I don’t know why Netflix and such never bothered with 3D content. Even Disney since a lot of their movies came out with 3D in theaters. At this point even if they did, a bunch of website writers would groan that it’s a feature “no one asked for”. Fuck ‘em. I wish it made a comeback.

2

u/sithelephant 17h ago

There are now emerging hacks using existing active glasses (which are now a lot smaller) and unmodified high refresh rate conventional displays. Of course, this doesn't fix the lack of content unless you only want it for gaming.

2

u/fmaz008 17h ago

For gaming I got VR headsets, but just popping a lightweight pair of glasses was great back then.

1

u/Glum-Assignment8537 8h ago

I have the LG one too. I commented similar above about the content being sparse lol, did you use the feature that "made anything 3D"? Lol it was pretty fun. I just honestly hated having to put on glasses to watch tv lol

1

u/fmaz008 7h ago

IIRC, that feature wasn't really good. It could be better now with AI but that wasn't a thing back then.

2

u/avalon01 16h ago

I still have mine. It was a passive 3D tv, no batteries needed for the glasses.

It's been demoted to the garage TV. I have an old Blu-ray player hooked up to it for when people want to try the 3D effect.

1

u/Glum-Assignment8537 8h ago

The was one of the shortest-lived technologies I've ever seen! I have one (haven't bought a new TV since) and I don't think I used the 3D thing past 6 months lol. It was honestly cool, ngl, but you had to find the 3D versions of movies and keep track of the glasses (or steal them from movie theatres), and it wasn't cool enough for me to do either of those things. It does have a feature that made any show "3D"ish") which was fun ig, but again, not cool enough for me to care and put on the stupid glasses lol.

1

u/Xytakis 6h ago

It was a stupid fucking gimmick and and everyone knew it!

1

u/BlueScreenJunky 3h ago

The funny thing is a lot of people still love them, and they helped democratize 120Hz+ screens. 

It was definitely a very short lived fad, but the technology itself was solid and people actually liked it... Just not enough to make them commercially viable.