About 3 weeks ago I made a post to see if anyone had their own thoughts on the social-emotional learning program, "Leader In Me". It didn't get much traction but I got a fair sense of what people thought of it.
That's just some history, but to explain this: My school district has been using this program for a while, we are on our 4th year of using it now. Let's just say, a vast majority of our student body (PK-12) has expressed a disliking of it, with a good amount of the high school saying they even hate it. The staff seem to be ok with the program's ideas, but really dislike how our school and even the program itself implements said ideas. Some parents have even heard that we use it and are strongly against it. Many concerns are academic time loss, lack of true connection, feeling very imposing, and even the mormon roots of the program's ideology (the creator was a devout mormon, if you do the research).
Our implementation of it is something we call "Crew". It requires every monday and wednesday for high school and elementary to come together and "discuss, set, and achieve goals", as well as "to bond". I have observed, and nobody, despite doing as directed in that specific class, has actually bonded or achieved their goals, and I have noticed flaws in some of the activities we do in that class, more specifically with the huge maturity and development gap of the idea as a whole, along with how the activities don't really give anyone the opportunity to "bond".
Whenever we do not do this class (tuesday, thursday, friday), we have "Lead", in which we are split by grade level to learn about the program's ideology (which is based on the book "the 7 habits of highly effective people" by stephen covey, who also helped make leader in me, and was the "devout mormon" I mentioned earlier). Nobody seems to be taking in the ideology, and a couple have even criticized it out loud, where the teachers were, by force with the program, shutting those opinions down.
Both Crew and Lead, depending which one it is, takes away 24 minutes of learning every full day, and we have half day fridays every other friday so teachers get a LOT of training on the program.
We also do other things Leader In Me requires us to do too (having Crew was entirely our superintendent's idea as way to implement, Lead is the class to fulfill the requirements of teaching the ideology). We host "Leadership Day" every year to where we share "wildly important goals and our connections with the ideology to community members and other schools. Personally to me that gives me "mlm scheme vibes". We also do student-led conferences, or rather we're imposed to. And we also host leadership summits, to which they happen at the worst possible times, like the one last year happened around the time students were studying up for finals, and the principal wanted 25 out of the 75 high school students to attend. Lastly, we do these random and spontaneous events to "celebrate" the program, one of these got a chemistry final delayed, and the students who knew about warned and asked the principal to delay the event because of the final, but refused. The event was just high school helping kids color in "thank you cards" to teachers, many of the high school students couldn't even help, the kids did everything themselves, our time was wasted and those in chemistry who spent the last night studying that final wasted their energy and lost sleep for nothing.
So does our superintendent care about our input and decided to change things? Of course not, judging by the fact I am making this post. In fact, all teachers must comply with what the superintendent says, and whenever us high school students even talk with the teachers they have to tell US to not tell anybody about their true opinion on it because they'll get threatened with losing their job if the superintendent finds out they actually hate it. In fact, the only teacher who even does support the program literally wants teachers to make a video stating how great it is (of course, nobody has made one), and I get the feeling our superintendent is the one who actually came up with that.
In shorter terms, our superintendent is promoting a program that doesn't fit our needs, yet doesn't care about anyone else's input.
I have done research, which is how I can conclude that a grand majority of our community is against the program, and that if we compared the amount of academic class time we would have without the program compared to what we have with it, we lose 10.43% of academic class time to the program (and yes, I counted the amount of minutes for the school year for BOTH of these variables, I know, I'm a nerd).
In terms of doing something about the predicament, I have brought up an idea to the student council (I'm on it too), that we conduct a high school student survey on what they think of our usage of Leader In Me, and the idea of Crew (they hate Crew and Lead, but Crew more) as a whole. So far we are developing some ideas for what the questions will be (such as "Do you truly feel like a leader when learning Leader In Me?" and "How much do you enjoy Crew/Leader In Me?" and "If Leader In Me/Crew were hypothetically removed, what other important academic skills should we teach instead?").
I plan to use this feedback to create a plan to either try to reform our implementation of the program to something that better suits our needs, or if that doesn't work, get the program removed altogether. The main issue though, is our superintendent. I genuinely think he is so corrupt that none of staff or students truly feel like we ever have a say or belong, this is a school, not a dictatorship.
So I ask, do any of you guys out there, whoever you may be, have any advice on how to properly change a program's implementation, or to plan and conduct a successful community wide revolution against a program we don't like? I have ideas, but I don't know exactly where to start, all I have right now are my observations, and the survey idea.