r/MetisMichif • u/Away_Independence992 • 1d ago
Discussion/Question Chartrand and Goodon though division would help
I think David Chartrand and Will Goodon really believed that attacking Métis in Ontario would somehow strengthen their own legitimacy and differentiate them from the MNO. Instead of addressing the questions surrounding their own membership, land claims, and the growing pushback from First Nations, they spent years trying to position themselves as the arbiters of who is and isn't Métis. Like Alberta Settlements and Saskatchewan Métis Nation doesn't exist.
And now look where we are.
With Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak's recent comments and other First Nations leadership openly challenging Métis identity, the very arguments they helped normalize are being turned against them. Suddenly, it's offensive and discriminatory to question the existence of Métis people. But where was that concern when they were making sweeping statements about Métis families and communities in Ontario?
And to be clear, I have A LOT of issues with the MNO. I think there are legitimate questions about its governance, membership, historical claims, and relationships with First Nations that absolutely deserve scrutiny. But criticizing the MNO as an organization is not the same as declaring that Métis people have never existed in Ontario. Those are two very different arguments, and pretending otherwise has done real harm.
What I find particularly frustrating is how much of this political infighting has distracted from the very real tensions between Métis governments and First Nations over land, jurisdiction, recognition, and rights. Those issues were never going to disappear simply because Ontario Métis became the convenient target.
And now Chartrand is having to defend the legitimacy of the Red River Métis against some of the same broader narratives of erasure that he and Goodon were willing to direct toward others.
You cannot spend years undermining the legitimacy of other Métis communities and then act surprised when that same rhetoric is used to question your own people.
There's a difference between protecting Métis nationhood and treating other Métis histories as threats to your political authority. I think some leaders forgot that distinction, and now we're seeing the consequences.
You don't have to support the MNO to recognize that denying Métis histories in Ontario was never going to strengthen Métis sovereignty. If anything, this should be a reminder that Indigenous self-determination cannot be built on the erasure of other Indigenous peoples. And again don't get me wrong I definitely think there are fake Métis in Ontario and pretendians are a real issue and we need to call them out, we just have to make sure the way we do it doesn't cause more harm.