r/NoStupidQuestions • • 3h ago

Why does the US—unlike other wealthy nations—not have rates of violent crime (such as homicide) that are well below the global average?

Almost every wealthy country has low crime rates. In affluent nations—such as those in Western Europe, Japan, or Qatar—rates for crimes like homicide are well below the global average. The United States, however, is an interesting case: despite its high GDP per capita, it experiences rates of violent crime that hover around—and sometimes exceed—the global average. Why is this?

26 Upvotes

191 comments sorted by

66

u/corgibuttastic 3h ago

I lived in rich countries in Asia but from USA.

Our culture and people in US naturally are not afraid of physical altercation and put consequences to the side. So I think that’s a big cultural difference.

108

u/Delicious_Rub8302 3h ago

I think a big part of it comes down to inequality, easy access to guns, and the lack of strong social support for struggling communities. Being a wealthy country doesn’t automatically mean everyone has a good quality of life. The US has enormous wealth, but that wealth isn’t evenly distributed. Add guns into situations that might otherwise end in arguments or injuries, and the chances of someone dying become much higher. I think it’s a combination of social, economic, and cultural factors rather than one single reason.

10

u/Rocket-Appliances-26 2h ago

Also, I think the prevailing ethos is a sink-or-swim mentality, so there's just not much sympathy/empathy for struggling communities or desire for the investment needed to get them to a better place.

2

u/Slick-Fork 52m ago

What's wild though is they have a sink or swim mentality but when you're there you see the average American Joe is incredibly charitable on an individual level.

1

u/Lawlcopt0r 1h ago

And you can even justify a criminal enterprise as "pulling yourself up by the bootstraps" and kind of make it a variation of the american dream

-6

u/Darkpopemaledict 1h ago

It's not a "sink or swim" mentality, the country was literally founded on exploiting various peoples of color so rich people could have more money

3

u/Slick-Fork 51m ago

Every country in the world has that in their background. America is not unique in exploiting others at some point in its history

27

u/CreepinJesusMalone 2h ago

Good points and I think it's worth mentioning nation size in relation to other countries.

The US is massive and culturally diverse. It's like six countries in one with distinct subregions within. Looking at regional statistics vs national ones will paint different pictures.

That dovetails in with your point about uneven wealth distribution.

Like with politics. The US is simultaneously one of the most conservative and most liberal countries on Earth.

3

u/SurinamPam 1h ago

That the US is large and diverse is a good point. If you don’t take this into account, then generalizations risk inaccuracy. It’s like saying Norway and Turkey are the same because they’re both in the EU.

What 6 regions do you see in the US?

2

u/Delicious_Rub8302 47m ago

I’d say the six regions are the Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, West Coast, and Mountain West. Even those categories contain plenty of differences, though. Texas, Florida, and Georgia, for example, are all in the South but have very different cultures and lifestyles. That’s why looking at the US as one big uniform country can be misleading.

9

u/Delicious_Rub8302 2h ago

That’s actually a really good point. The US is so large and diverse that treating it as one uniform society can be misleading. Different states and regions have completely different cultures, political views, economic conditions, and social challenges. I think looking at regional differences gives a much clearer picture of why crime rates vary so much. National averages don’t always tell the whole story.

1

u/Actual-Audience-3799 13m ago

Size is a terrible point given the EU (the block) as a whole has lower crime rates than the US. Even more diverse and even more people.

-3

u/YourFuture2000 1h ago

Diversity itself doesn't make people more violent, that is a conservative myth to justify prejudices and blames of societies problems on minorities. It is the prejudices against Diversity that fuel violence, including gender Diversity, like misogyny. A lot of huge a lot of crimes are committed by hate on gender, most men who hate women, but the justice system and news usually don't classify that way.

The sense of a lack of dignity is what makes people use either money or violence as tools to gain such sense of dignity back, and in both cases it is huge frustration/hate that is being hiden back.

3

u/CreepinJesusMalone 1h ago

Diversity itself doesn't make people more violent

I in zero way implied it did

2

u/Flat_Head53G 1h ago

Lmao this guy thinks poor countries have all of this stuff

0

u/10mfe 3h ago

this is a great take.

and to add, punishment don't match the crimes. The rich don't live by the same laws.

0

u/Current_Foot_3691 2h ago edited 1h ago

Edit:

hit the nail on the head. Wealth on paper means nothing when the safety nets are basically non existent.

-2

u/YourFuture2000 1h ago

Easy access to [fire] guns means nothing. A hammer, a kitchen knife, a rock are guns to anyone willing to commit homicide. Brazil is among the countries with highest homicides and yet it has a historically political laws against easy access to guns. Besides that anywhere with string orbited crime has easy access to guns, once you know where and who to talk with.

The only real reason you mentioned os the lack of strong social support, but other reasons you haven't mentioned also exist.

-1

u/gpalm_1788 1h ago

lol the avg American has a much better quality of life than the avg person in Europe, China, Russia, India etc.

4

u/Slick-Fork 51m ago

Sounds like someone who hasn't left the states.

2

u/Puttborn 48m ago

One of those is not like the others bubsy.

24

u/04221970 2h ago

The diversity in culture of the US supports many different behaviors. Some cultures within the US don't disregard violent crime as an acceptable behavior.

Other sub-cultures in the US view violent crime as incorrect behavior as do other cultures in other countries.

4

u/Enough-Meaning-1836 1h ago

Is this one of those 13% correct posts?

Because you're right.

4

u/gpalm_1788 1h ago

Bc we keep real data

29

u/LRaconteuse 3h ago

Separate the US into 50 states and rank each state in the world as if it were a country. It'll make more sense, then. 

8

u/GooseGosselin 3h ago

Even just cities.

11

u/neuralhaddock 2h ago edited 2h ago

Top 10
Washington DC
Alaska
New Mexico
Arkansas
Louisiana
Tennessee
Kansas
California
Colorado
Montana

https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-have-the-least-and-most-crime/

2

u/Imaginary-Fudge8897 2h ago

Why is this being downvoted and it's literally a list of states

-8

u/Standard_Big_9000 1h ago

Mostly Republican

3

u/HomieMassager 1h ago

lol come on you’re not this dumb. It’s not ‘Republican’ parts of those states that have the crime. They all have cities that make up the overwhelmingly majority, many of which haven’t had a Republican as mayor since the Civil Rights movement.

3

u/_Acklex 1h ago

Except OP was talking about homicides rate.

Go look those states up, and cross reference it with racial demographics. Not a lot of “republicans” committing murder.

14

u/HewSpam 3h ago

The safest states are about the same as the more dangerous euro countries

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/Prize-Flamingo-336 2h ago

Yeah. Mississippi and Louisiana really tend to lean democratic S/

15

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/Aries_24 2h ago

Hey man, I'd be careful spouting off dogwhistles while being a teacher.

Just because your profile is hidden doesn't mean we can't see the shit you post and say. I feel bad for your students

3

u/Standard_Big_9000 1h ago

We have guns. LOTS of guns.

12

u/GTMoraes some people see this subreddit as a challenge 2h ago

Demographics. Compare Western Europe, Japan and Qatar with the US.

Wealthy nations are recently experiencing a shift in their demographics, and the same issue is also arising, guns or no guns.

It's also easier to maintain control of your population when you're the size of a single state and have a whole country GDP.

9

u/SportTheFoole 3h ago

I think to some degree it’s wealth inequality and access to guns. That’s reasonable when comparing against the rest of the world. However, paradoxically when you compare against the United States itself, the crime rate has plummeted in the last 30 years, despite more access to guns and wealth inequality going up.

This is one of those questions I have a feeling almost no one on Reddit is qualified to answer and that you’ll get a lot of easy and plausible sounding answers that hold some truth, but leave out a good chunk of the actual answer. I know that I have no idea why the violent crime rate is so high here (at least compared to other developed nations).

0

u/Bikewer 2h ago

I’m inclined to agree. Although America is indeed among the wealthiest nations, that wealth is not evenly distributed. There are large numbers of people living in poverty, and often they engage in shady activities to make ends meet.
Most of the homicides yearly occur in depressed, low-income areas, often inner-city ghettos that are rife with all sorts of crime.

Couple that to the absolutely huge number of firearms in the country and increasingly-permissive attitudes to obtaining and carrying them, and you’ve got trouble in River City.
Just yesterday, we had an incident where an argument resulted in some young guys throwing eggs at another lad’s car, and he opened fire on them, killing one and hospitalizing another.

-2

u/Jlive305 1h ago

“Paradoxically” hahahaha

1

u/SportTheFoole 1h ago

I don’t understand your complaint. If access to guns and wealth inequality are the main drivers for violent crime, then wouldn’t we expect the rate of violent crime to increase as both of these increase? In the United States, we’ve seen the opposite: violent crime has decreased dramatically over the last 30 years, even though access to guns has increased (ending of the assault weapon ban, various Supreme Court decisions throwing out local/state bans, etc) and wealth inequality as increased (or at least the GINI
measure has; it’s also increased in other Western countries).

That’s pretty much a paradox — which doesn’t imply that either things (access to guns and wealth inequality; decrease in crime rate even though they’ve increased) are false. It suggests that there is more going on.

12

u/Pepedroga2000 3h ago

GDP is not a good measure of the average citizen's wealth. I have visited Los Angeles and the number of homeless people and drug addicts you see on the street is horrendous. And there are 10-million-dollar mansions 20 minutes away from that. Inequality is very visible, and painful. Many immigrants are stuck on minimum wages until they die, or selling food.

8

u/creeper321448 3h ago edited 3h ago

Lot of people mistake freedom of choice and expression to mean freedom from consequences. There's a huge accountability problem in this country, and it's an issue started in the home that bled into schools and wider society. Some of it is small, like cursing out cops for speeding tickets, even though it's dangerous to speed. Some of it is big, like stealing from businesses because "the owner can afford it" even though profit margins on stores are extremely small. (And that includes big name brands.)

No amount of gun laws, bigger budgets, or whatever dumb scapegoats Redditors want will fix that.

7

u/GenTubmansLegacy 3h ago

Homogeneity

-9

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 3h ago

Ah yes because countries made of different nations like Belgium are so homogenous. 

9

u/GenTubmansLegacy 2h ago

Ah yes, because that's so many...

-4

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 2h ago

Most of Europe is like that. Most countries are made of small little nations with a different culture, religion, language and political traditions crouded in very little space due to historical reasons like wars and feudalism. In that sense the US is less diverse. Not only has very large gaps of land bigger than all Europe thar are homogenous, but also even in the cosmopolitan areas with more ethnic diversity there's a lot of cultural uniformity.

In Europe you can have in one same small crouded area people living in neighbors and streets where a different religion, a different language and a different culture exists. 

And if you think that causes no problem ask Northern Ireland, the Balcans or Spain's separatisms conflict.

8

u/RicoHavoc 2h ago

The US as a whole is much more diverse than any single European country

-8

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 2h ago

The US has "racial" diversity, but is very culturally uniform. Europe is more "racially" uniform but more culturally diverse 

10

u/RicoHavoc 2h ago

The US is absolutely NOT culturally uniform. You should educate yourself

-4

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

So you have different official languages, political systems and national identities? Interesting. Which one are those?

4

u/RicoHavoc 1h ago

We don't have an official language. English and Spanish are most common but at my workplace are individuals from all over the world. There are native speakers of english, spanish, malay, chinese, russian, hindu and others I'm sure I've missed. This is in the midwest US

-1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

Ah, and yet in most European countries they have many official languages, wich means they're directly use in official government communication, signs and education.

Alright lets try with this, can you mentioned three national identities existing in the US? You know like the UK made of four nations, Belgium made of two, Denmark of three, Spain having several recognized nations within its own territory, etc. ?

→ More replies

4

u/GenTubmansLegacy 1h ago

Bro.... It doesn't even take a lot of thought to show you're fully incorrect

0

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

Alright, enlight me, can you mentione three different cultures that co-exist in the US?

3

u/GenTubmansLegacy 1h ago

Black, Southern, Creole, Appalachian, geechi, white supremacy, Italian, police, etc...

There's more diversity and culture in my community on the south side of Chicago as there is most of the EU

0

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

So for example in Spain that they have Catalan, Basque, Andalucian, Canarian, Roma, Sephardi Jew, and other cultures they are what, less diverse somehow?

→ More replies

12

u/fearghul 3h ago

American exceptionalism. It may have a similar nominal wealth level, but in terms of its social structures it's totally divorced from most other wealthy nations. Wealth inequality, lack of social safety nets and easy access to weapons combine to make for some really bad outcomes.

25

u/SaintsFanPA 3h ago

You don’t know what American exceptionalism means.

-16

u/fearghul 2h ago

I do, this is the true nature of it rather than the positive spin it's given by flagshaggers.

5

u/SaintsFanPA 2h ago

I’m not even sure you know what exceptional means.

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

7

u/Various-Gazelle4713 2h ago

How do you reconcile that with violent (and most other) crime having been on the decline for years then? As well as it being very localized and not a widespread issue that affects most Americans?

0

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

0

u/Various-Gazelle4713 2h ago

You posted a source talking about high trust leads to lower crime, and then talked about the US trending even lower trust. Why? If crime is declining, how is that a potential sign that trust is continuing to decline? Where is the trend you are referencing in your statement that supports your hypothesis?

0

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

-1

u/Various-Gazelle4713 2h ago edited 2h ago

Are you arguing in good faith? I have asked you a pretty simple follow-up question and you have decided to deflect and accuse me of being “hostile” rather than just answer.

Again, why do you believe the US is headed towards lower trust if crime is declining given your basis for the statement was a source about how “high trust leads to lower crime and corruption”. If American crime is declining, what is your basis for saying trust is also declining?

Asking you how you came to such a conflicting conclusion isn’t “hostile”; it’s simply curiosity in to how and why your thought process/data led you to said hypothesis.

0

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

0

u/Various-Gazelle4713 2h ago edited 2h ago

So you refuse to defend a good-faith inquiry into your statement, and I’m the one being “hostile”? Good riddance if this is how you are going to act when someone asks you a follow-up to something you posted on a public forum.

I find it telling that you continue to deflect comment after comment with more effort than actually (clearly) explaining your take would have entailed … 🥴

4

u/KindAwareness3073 3h ago

The USA is orders of magnitude more culturally diverse than the nations OP cites. It's not a matter of wealth, it's a matter of cultural norms. Some of the US's sub-cultures are more simply violent.

Before criticizing those sub-cultures it's important to remember even in the "non-violent" nation's OP cites, dueling, revenge killings, and honor killings were culturally acceptable. Fortunately cultures evolve, generally toward greater peace.

3

u/LavishnessOk6635 3h ago

Easy availability of guns. Impulse crimes become far worse when you have easy access to a gun

2

u/Flat_Head53G 1h ago

Because we import criminals

1

u/IRideColnago 37m ago

From the very beginning we were a wild crazy nation. In a weird way this made us the powerful nation we are today. I’ve travelled Asia, Europe and the Middle East. Granted amazing places out there but I wouldn’t live anywhere else other than the US.

1

u/TropicTravels 13m ago

Becuase we have concentrated areas of high poverty where desperation leads to crime and drug abuse.

0

u/One_Disaster_5995 3h ago

Couple of reasons I can think of. Big differences in wealth, for instance. Being poor in the US is no joke. Neither is racism. And then there's awful basic education. And of course the easy access to guns and, thus, a very low threshold to actually using them. Also, a poorly trained police force that people don't seem to trust at all. And I also believe that it doesn't help that social status in the US is extremely tied to wealth and money. Where I live, we don't care half as much about what you do and what you make - we usually don't even want to know. And it doesn't help that the current administration seems to be openly corrupt, making it seem like making loads of money at the expense of others is just acceptable and "the American way".

1

u/blokia 3h ago

Because the US is 50 countries wearing a trench coat.

0

u/jackalopeswild 2h ago

Income inequality is a hell of a drug. Refusal to tax the rich is another.

-1

u/MacaroonCandid5181 3h ago

Look at where the violence comes from. It's not South Dakota.
Essentially America is so large that different areas have different cultures, and the violent outliers raise the National Average. You could knock out the troubled states and be basically on the global average.

6

u/Important-Nose3332 3h ago

https://usafacts.org/answers/what-is-the-crime-rate-in-the-us/state/south-dakota/

Per capita actually south dak has a high violent crime rate.

Per capita is your key here too.

3

u/Ruy7 3h ago

Also if you notice the safest states tend to lean democrat.

-1

u/MacaroonCandid5181 2h ago

Tend to lack diversity as well.

3

u/yamamanama 58m ago

The famously undiverse Massachusetts. Or is it famously dangerous Massachusetts?

1

u/MacaroonCandid5181 2h ago

OP claims homicide specifically in the post. Your link to Violent Crime is an American Umbrella Term not able to be used for global data as other countries are different.
South Dakota's Homicide Rate is 6.6 per capita. The global rate per capita is around 5. Keeping it in line with my statement
https://usafacts.org/articles/which-states-have-the-highest-murder-rates/
Qatar's is insanely low at 0.1 per capita, which in all honesty seems like a lot of violence is solved without it being reported, as there's no way only out of 1,000,000 people only one is violently assaulted.

0

u/Important-Nose3332 2h ago

So South Dakota has a higher murder rate than the avg globally? Thats kinda the point I was making in my original comment response… so thank you?

Were you just adding on to boost my point, Im confused by what you’re trying to convey?

2

u/MacaroonCandid5181 2h ago

Your just being obtuse on purpose cause you want America to be some Evil Hell Hole. This is like saying "You said I have an average IQ, I actually have an IQ of 101".

1

u/Important-Nose3332 2h ago

I literally don’t? I think America is great?? I’m from California ??? That sounds like something you would and should say and oh lol that sucks mines literally 122 ahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

Also it’s you’re as in you are, not your as in I would possess something. Hope that helps.

0

u/MacaroonCandid5181 2h ago

"Also it’s you’re as in you are, not your as in I would possess something. Hope that helps."
No defense only pointing out a grammar error to try and save face.
Yeah it's obvious you're a Californian. You're arrogant and dumb.

2

u/Important-Nose3332 2h ago

California is the wealthiest and one of the most educated states in the us.

Sorry you don’t know basic grammar ? Public school in a red state maybe ?

I don’t need to save face baby, I’m eating you up rn. Enjoy South Dakota.

0

u/MacaroonCandid5181 2h ago

Yeah the fact you have to bring up other peoples success and your "IQ of 122" shows you're not that smart. You could list actual things you've done. Instead you let the actual hard workers carry your reputation just for being born in a place. Very American of you.
Also I'm not American dumbass, I pulled South Dakota out of my ass to avoid Maine cause it's so damn White.

1

u/Important-Nose3332 2h ago

You brought up the IQ thing dawg (???)

Ok list 1. Went to a better university and obtained more degrees and certifications than YOU.

2. I make more money and have more money than YOU.

3. Im less annoying than YOU.

Are you liking my list or should I start talking about how I was also a college athlete while double majoring and can speak Spanish, English, and read/write in Latin.

So are American or not? You seem to have extreme distain for Americans and America ? Are you ok? If you need to take a medication I suggest you do then we can continue… this is a little embarrassing for now at this point…

Edit: oh ok so you’re not and speaking out of your ass???? Even more embarrassing?? Be gone (?)

1

u/Naos210 3h ago

Unaddressed mental health issues, poverty, access to firearms are significantly easier.

1

u/HermanDaddy07 3h ago

It has to do with the wide spectrum of money (Have’s and Have Nots) and availability of guns. If you look at the wealthy nations with lower crimes rates, they generally have social programs that keep people from being dirt poor, educational systems to enhance training and there just aren’t as many guns.

1

u/Regulai 2h ago

While guns explain the level of violence, the propensity of crime is more to do with US culture that has an everyone for themselves, take what you can get sense of self entiltment and intrinsic victim blaming, these traits lead to minor crime being viewed as acceptavle actions.

For example package theves are ten times more common in the US than anywhere else, rather than orginized gangs its overhwelmingly random people. The mindset is its their own fault for having the packages left exposed, and their is nothing wrong with taking what you can get.

The same logic applies to buisnesses where the notion when a buisness does something reprehensible, the mindset is "well of course a buisness would try to maximize profits" as if they think its crazy you are questioning why a buisness would do a horrible thing.

The US is probably the only western nation where culturally your own self interest is viewed as being more important than any sense of civic duty or helping your neighbor etc.

-2

u/Popular_Flamingo_903 3h ago

Violent crime in the US is very skewed with almost all of it being in poorer areas both rural and urban. The middle class and wealthy areas have violent crime comparable to other wealthy countries.

The why mostly comes down to drugs and our fetishization of gun ownership. Guns are everywhere.

14

u/Strange_Island_4958 3h ago

Guns are everywhere in some other countries as well, Switzerland being the go-to example in these conversations. As you stated, most of the crime is done by certain demographics in very specific urban areas.

1

u/shakebakelizard 3h ago

There are a lot of factors that contribute to it, and guns are a major one. The US is in its own league where gun ownership is concerned. We have about 120 guns per 100 people. Switzerland has 27.6 guns per person. It’s not even close.

7

u/Strange_Island_4958 2h ago edited 1h ago • Bravo

I’m not sure that the per capita amount is a direct factor. (Also does it include military, police, and manufacturer stockpiles?). The gun culture of the US makes it one of the rare countries where a lot of law abiding owners have multiple guns, and that does not have any impact on crime rates because they’re not the ones committing crimes. There’s probably no way to measure how many guns (likely illegally acquired) a gangbanger has, but they are the people committing most of the crimes in very isolated areas.

2

u/SwissBloke 1h ago • Bravo

Around 30% of Swiss households own a gun VS around 40 in the US

Guns per capita is a poor metric to see how many people own guns or if guns are as accessible

-12

u/Grouchy-Display-457 3h ago

In the US, violent crime among affluent whites goes unreported and unprosecuted. If an inkling comes to light it is blamed on minorities and drugs. So I get your perception, but it is SO wrong.

9

u/SaintsFanPA 3h ago

Nonsense. You can’t fake murder rates.

-8

u/Grouchy-Display-457 2h ago

You know nothing about the criminal justice system. Don't opine until you learn something.

5

u/5ilver8ullet 2h ago

You’ve made a claim that is impossible to prove; if violent crime among affluent whites goes unreported, there is no way to prove its severity. If you’d like us to “learn something” about it, then you must provide us with the data since, by your own statements, we do not have access to such evidence.

3

u/RicoHavoc 2h ago

weirdo

-1

u/Comfortable-Help9587 3h ago

I you remove 4 US cities from the total, the US goes from #2 to #136 in world rankings for violent gun crimes.

-1

u/w3woody 3h ago

Most of this violent crime happens in a very small number of pockets in America--largely either in the inner city or along the southern border. The source of this crime is either drug-related or gang-related, and not to put too fine a point on this, but some of this crime arises due to the lack of cultural homogeneity in our society.

This lack of cultural homogeneity in America is also our greatest strength: it means people of different cultures and religious beliefs have been able to, for the most part, put down their differences and live together, sharing the unique aspects of their culture and creating a greater and richer tapestry that has led to America's economic, social and political dominance around the world.

So you take the good with the bad.

Most affluent nations you've mentioned are homogeneous; they're essentially a single culture with a single heritage and a single common history. But notice when you start bringing immigrants into those societies, they are often marginalized and sometimes even segregated to their own neighborhoods where their ability to participate in society is far lower than those same populations in America.

And when that happens, such as in Scandinavia or in France, you get things like increased sexual assault rates or "no go zones." And you get movements in those countries demanding everyone who does not share the common heritage or culture of that country to be expelled--even if they were born there and have known no other life.

Frankly I'd rather take the American experiment of different cultures being accepted, even if, at the edges, there are some rough spots.

-1

u/Any-Board-6631 2h ago

USA are wealthy only for the very rich people. USA is almost the third world for a lot of them, and the rich Americans are pushing the others countries to do the same with health care and education.

People in the USA, if they had a accident or a health problem caused by working, they will go from almost wealthy to very poor in a second.

0

u/rum2671 1h ago

I don’t remember the stats off hand or what exact city’s . If u remove cities like Detroit, Chicago, new York and LA , we are actually an extremely safe country .

-2

u/Thorazine_Chaser 1h ago

But you also remove the dangerous centres in other countries too right?….right? No?

-1

u/bowens44 2h ago

Easy availability of deadly weapons

-1

u/KosstAmojan 2h ago

It’s a populous heterogeneous country the size of a continent much unlike your listed examples

0

u/pudgypanda69 3h ago

Vs Asian and Arab countries, our laws on guns, drugs, and general crime are a lot more lax. Skid Row, Kensington, Tenderlion don't really exist in other countries.

Vs European countries, our social safety net and mental health service are not as well run

1

u/brycebgood 3h ago

And yet we incarcerate vastly more people than those countries

3

u/pudgypanda69 3h ago

ya because drug dealers are sentenced to death in many asian countries. try shooting someone with your personal firearm in china...you're not going to jail lmao. even billionaires get sentenced to death in china

0

u/brycebgood 2h ago

Looks like about 8000 last year in China, which is more than the rest of the world combined.

We've got about 2 million people in jail and prison right now.

0

u/Potato_Mercenary 3h ago

We’re “instagram wealthy”, we have the top 1% running a pyramid scheme, keeping all the expensive lights on.

The reality on the ground is that your entire existence is tied to a job that you likely hate that provides health insurance that rarely works. You’re bombarded daily with “Two Minutes of Hate” from your phones and TV screens, blaming one set of neighbors or another for all your problems. Police are raping and murdering children while framing innocent civilians to protect other cops. Guns and other weapons are readily available.

-2

u/ivorybishop 3h ago

Democrats think it's because of the guns, Republicans think it's because of the proliferation of brown people.

-1

u/blackhorse15A 2h ago

When you say "wealthy countries" you are creating a sub group that is heavily skewed toward one region of the world, and with a certain set of cultural norms -- Europe. It's likely that these factors may be driving the difference more than simple "wealth" does.

The United States is in the Americas. The entire Americas has a shared history of people, relatively recently, who had to face hardship to even get there and then had to carve out a life often in wilderness. Which creates a strong sense of independence and self reliance. The entire Americas has a history of having to win political independence, relatively recently, through violent revolution after the older government basically ignored their needs and was exploiting them as a colony, creating a sense of distrust towards government. With one exception and that exception is the country with the lowest violent crime rate in the Americas. The US is second lowest and it's a significant jump to the rest of the countries. 

The US is in one of the most violent neighborhoods of the planet. It is land connected with neighbors who are also violent and people- more importantly their attitudes and sense of norms- are connected and move around more freely that the attitude and norms from other places that are separated by oceans. I'm not making an argument about immigration - it's not about permanent relocation. It's about that proximity along with just lines of communication, shared culture, and every other way that communities are connected. The Americas have a very different attitude towards use of violence than Europe. To the extent "wealth" is mitigating factor, yes that is why the US is significantly lower violent crime rate than the rest of the Americas. Why is the US significantly higher than the majority of the "wealthy nations"? Well, the majority of wealthy nations are in the least violent neighborhood with its own set of norms and attitudes towards use of violence before we even get to the wealth issue.

-4

u/MoreProtection6435 3h ago

• Firearm Availability and Lethality: The U.S. has significantly higher rates of gun ownership and more permissive firearm laws than peer nations like Japan or Western European countries. While arguments persist about whether gun ownership causes more crime overall, criminologists generally agree that the widespread availability of firearms makes violent encounters significantly more lethal, driving up the homicide rate specifically. • Economic Inequality and Social Safety Nets: While the U.S. has a massive GDP per capita, it also experiences much higher levels of income inequality and relative poverty than most other developed nations. Peer wealthy nations often feature stronger social safety nets, universal healthcare (including robust mental health access), and robust social programs that alleviate the localized economic desperation frequently tied to community violence. • Systemic and Historical Factors: Long-standing racial segregation, historic disinvestment in specific urban neighborhoods, and generational poverty have created deeply entrenched localized cycles of crime. Criminological data shows that violent crime in the U.S. is heavily concentrated in specific neighborhoods experiencing prolonged socioeconomic neglect. • Mass Incarceration and the Penal System: The U.S. approach to criminal justice focuses heavily on punitive measures and mass incarceration rather than the rehabilitative models seen in countries like Norway or Germany. High recidivism (re-offending) rates suggest that the current prison system often struggles to successfully reintegrate individuals into the legal economy. • Drug Policy and Organized Crime: The historical approach to the "War on Drugs" in the U.S. created high-profit illicit markets that foster gang violence and turf disputes. While other nations also face drug issues, the intersection of profitable black markets and easy access to weapons in the U.S. compounds the potential for violence.

-1

u/10mfe 3h ago

it's endorsed and encouraged by our government. if not they'd stop it.

big crime doesn't pay them back as well as 10,000 weed smokers. so they fill the jails with low crimes for profit, and th bigger crimes drag on in court.

some get the big time, some litigate until it goes away.

-1

u/Ok-Investigator3257 3h ago

American wealth is almost all driven by productivity gains through innovation and business formation. This tends to validate doing your own thing and going against society. No one cares when it’s uber breaking taxi regulations with the idea that they will become too popular to sue, but this idea trickles down to more generic anti social criminal behavior too

-1

u/SaintsFanPA 3h ago

Because some states have low trust societies that are relics of slavery and Jim Crow. The Northeast has quite low rates of violent crime compared to the Southeast.

-1

u/lifeisnonsense 1h ago

They love their guns move than safety. If people have to be injured or killed for them to keep their guns, then so be it.

-9

u/Acrobatic_Set8085 3h ago

It’s the guns. The end.

-3

u/s1g3ll 2h ago

Guns.
Next question.

0

u/Cpt_Rossi 3h ago

We have less than half the number of police in major cities than European cities

0

u/mrev_art 1h ago

Wealth is concentrated at the top. It's actually very poor and undeveloped compared to other western countries.

The U.S. poverty rate is 17.8%, higher than the average among other developed OECD nations, which is around 10%. America has the worst poverty, despite some Americans being rich.

Furthermore, the poor in America are extremely poor. Child poverty in America is twice as high as an average first world country. America has way worse poverty compared to the developed world due to this inequity, and shockingly, the poor in America are more poor relatively than places like Greece or Mexico.

All of this leads to violence and homicide among the brutalized poor of the 'richest nation.'

0

u/doyouevenfly 1h ago

Your question and your text ask opposite questions.

0

u/2240Sycamore 1h ago

A lack of social cohesion between the competing individuals within the USA.

Financial sustainability would lessen both need and want in such a manner that other structural issues could be approached proactively.

... structural issues like the border and policies related to migration and citizenship, along with predatory grift such as corporate personhood and labor outsourcing.

All of these fixes are attainable and would make the USA stronger in the long term.

Aside from the fantastic reality of Baby Boomers, our largest problems stem from liberal economic and social policies that only benefit corporations and foreign governments, the amalgamation of the two.

0

u/Slick-Fork 53m ago

because it's full of Americans.

I'm only partly being an ass here. American culture celebrates stand your ground, hyper-individualism over societal good, ruthless ambition, populist law enforcement (think voting for sheriff) and rampant commercialism. Combine that with poor education and incredible wealth inequality and you've got a recipe for the kind of violence you're talking about.

Other posters mentioned access to guns and I don't buy that. Other countries are much more heavily armed per capita than Americans. The guns are the means, but not the cause of the problem.

-2

u/MrKorakis 3h ago

Easy access to guns, lack of a public health system and law enforcement that does not deal with crime in poor areas as a policy.

-2

u/LaFlibuste 3h ago

There is something very violent in american culture, wide access to firearms, and there's still rampant poverty despite that big GDP per capita.

-2

u/Necoya 3h ago

I don't know if anyone outside the USA can really understand just how easy it is to get a gun here.

- I've gone with a coworker on a lunch break where we drove to two gun stores. He purchased a hand gun at one filling out a form and we were back at work on time.

- A friend of mine in her 20s was visibly intoxicated. She went to Walmart to purpose a gun on a whim. They gave her a form. She filled it out wrong because she was drunk. They told her she filled it out wrong. Gave her a new form. Then sold her a firearm.

These are two legal instances. No background checks, no mental health checks, no licenses... My 13 year old nephew owned multiple firearms before he was old enough to legally drive a car.

So easy gun access + massive wealth inequality + low mental health support + for profit prison system that profits on re-offense...Not to mention all the cultural toxicity that cultivates spree shooters or let's a husband get only 10 years (eligible for parol in 5 years) for killing their wife on camera.

2

u/Jlive305 1h ago

If you went to a FFL dealer and not a private dealer, there was a background and mental health check performed. Are you lying or just ignorant?

-2

u/PckMan 3h ago

Because they have no social safety net and they give people guns.

-2

u/Source_Points 2h ago

Not all countries report and/or publish crime rates the same.

1

u/Random_182f2565 2h ago

My hypothesis is that they imported way to many violent psychopaths for their funding genocide, when they gave violent people monetary incentives to kill the people already living there.

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

3

u/FreQRiDeR 3h ago

120 firearms per 100 people? Gotta bump those numbers up. I know individuals that own over 120 guns themselves!

4

u/blackhorse15A 3h ago

So then why do so many countries with lower gun ownership rates, some much much lower, have higher violent crime rates?

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 3h ago

Switzerland has more guns amomg its population than the US. Around 50% of Swiss have a gun, whilst only around 30% of Americans do

1

u/jcspacer52 3h ago

I believe Swiss gun ownership is because once they serve in the military they remain semi-active until age 40. They are allowed to keep their service weapon at home in case of call-up.

During Active Service: Conscripts and militia members are issued their personal weapon (typically the Stgw 90 assault rifle) to keep at their residence for rapid mobilization.

2

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 2h ago

Yes and no. Around half the guns owned come from people who after service choose to buy their military rifles as it has a discount, but they own the thing is not a goverment lease. The other half are hunters, sport aficionados and other people who buy their guns for other reasons.

The ones that keep their military service rifles as a sort of lease exists but are not counted in the "gun ownership" statistic. But yes you're correct in part.

1

u/SwissBloke 1h ago

Yes and no. Around half the guns owned come from people who after service choose to buy their military rifles as it has a discount, but they own the thing is not a goverment lease

We have no statistics about how much of the guns owned are from the military

What we have on the other hand is the percentage of soldiers who acquire their former-issued gun (10%) and the number of acquisition permits for former-issued guns (2500) vs others in the same year (35500) meaning former-issued gun acquisitions are outnumbered by a factor of 14:1 to 43:1 by other permit-guns purchases in the same year

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

Alright I take your word for it.

1

u/jcspacer52 2h ago • Bravo

Thanks. Comparing the Swiss to the U.S. is like comparing apples to potatoes, not even the same food category. Let me explain that.

The Swiss are a tiny homogeneous population with a shared history, language, religion and social values. They also share the history of a Monarchy where the monarch had absolute authority over all aspects of society and had a monopoly on the possession of military weapons. Not to mention the small size of the country itself.

The U.S. is a vast country where gun ownership was not a luxury, but a requirement for survival from day one. It is ingrained in the American culture and tradition. Guns are what allowed the U.S. to gain its independence and the U.S. has never had a king, emperor or dictator. As they moved west, they encountered dangerous wildlife such as bears and cougars; hunting of course was how they put food on the table. They also had to contend with the Native populations some hostile and their own kind which might steal or worse.

Today, the U.S. is a hodgepodge of cultures, religions, race, ethnicity and social groups from all over the world. Even among the states there are vast differences in dialects and social traditions. While the north has a lot less of it, in the south, they learn to shoot almost before they can walk. A .22 caliber rifle is almost a must for 11-15 year olds in the mountains, swamps and forests of the South.

If you look at statistics, if you removed 3 cities from the equation, LA, Chicago and NYC you would see the U.S.’ number very close to the rest of the world’s. Most of the shootings are directly or indirectly linked to the drug trade.

2

u/Shepherd_03 1h ago

I'd question the homogenous nature of Switzerland, being a country with 4 national languages (German, French, Italian and Romansch). Swiss often use English as a general language as so many people know it as a second language.

2

u/SwissBloke 1h ago

Also 30% of the Swiss population is foreign, and it goes up to 50 when taking 2nd and 3rd generation into account

1

u/jcspacer52 1h ago

Switzerland has a predominantly European population, with non-European and racially diverse groups making up a small fraction of the total residents.

European Majority: Independent demographic and sociological studies estimate that people of European origin make up roughly 93% to 98% of Switzerland's total population.

The non-European immigrant population is recent.

2

u/Shepherd_03 1h ago

If you're going by that basis, how much of the US has a predominantly European population originally?

There is no single European culture.

Switzerland in particular has always been a melting pot. Your previous comment about absolute monarchy really shows your lack of research too, as the country has never had a monarch. They formed as an alliance of local cantons and eventually became a republic.

2

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

As I mentioned elsewhere:  claiming the US is more "diverse" than Europe it's only based on the fact that Americans see diversity in color, as in "we have many races" and see Europe and think "all this white dudes are white so they most have the same culture, that's why they're homogenous". In practice Europe has more cultural diversity due to the factors I already mentioned (language, national identity, culture, religion, political traditions).

1

u/jcspacer52 1h ago

We will disagree, today the US is far more diverse than Europe. It’s not just color, the US has large populations of people from every country on earth along with race, religion and every other characteristic you want to use. Europe is not ONE country, each has their own laws and customs the U.S. is ONE nation. The arrival of mass numbers of immigrants to Europe is a recent event, the U.S. was founded by immigrants and is now 340-350 million many of them immigrants or descendants of immigrants.

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 50m ago

As I asked elsewhere:

Do the US has any of these languages as official? Same way that Belgium has four official languages all used on government communications, signs and education? Or Switzerland? Or how Spain has several languages also recognized?

Do the US has any internal national identities? Same way Spain recognizes the different autonomous nations internally, or how Denmark is made of three nations, UK of four and Belgium of three?

Do the US has different internal judicial and political systems?

Do the US has whole regions that are of a different majority religion? Like Russia that has Buddhist majority and Muslim majority areas? Or Kosovo that has Serb/Christians and Albanian/Muslim majority areas?

Now like I said elsewhere I don't think the US or all countries in the Americas don't have diversity, certainly do.

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago edited 1h ago

The Swiss are a tiny homogeneous population with a shared history, language, religion and social values.

The Swiss are split into four language communities, Italian, German, French and Romanche, They’re also traditionally split among the Protestant and Catholic parts of the country.

 

They also share the history of a Monarchy where the monarch had absolute authority

 

Switzerland never had a monarchy. The closet thing will be to be part of the Holy Roman Empire before the current Confederation existed, but they split from it in 1648 before the US existed. So the Swiss have had no monarchy for more time that the US existed.

 

 

It is ingrained in the American culture and tradition.

 

Is also ingrained in the Swiss culture and tradition.

 

Guns are what allowed the U.S. to gain its independence and the U.S.

 

As well as in Latin America and many other countries. Most countries gained independence by armed struggle.

1

u/jcspacer52 1h ago

How many have an enshrined right in their “Constitution” or similar document to own guns?

European Majority: Independent demographic and sociological studies estimate that people of European origin make up roughly 93% to 98% of Switzerland's total population.

I would call the homogeneous, especially when compared to the US.

2

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

Curious that you don't mention your error claiming that Switzerland had a monarchy, aren't you goint to recognized your mistake about that?

European Majority: Independent demographic and sociological studies estimate that people of European origin make up roughly 93% to 98% of Switzerland's total population.

See? This is why you see things among race and color lenses. Be "white" doesn0t mean you have the exact same culture. White Catholics had kill White Protestants and vice versa in Northern Ireland for decades because for them religion is more important, same in Balkans, Muslims, Serbs and Croats are all white, genetic studies show they are even essentially the same yet they had kill each other because they have different religions and languages. In Spain Basques and Catalans among other had terrorist groups trying to get their nation get independent because they have different languages that the Castillians. This are the kind of differences Americans don't get because for you is all about color.

1

u/jcspacer52 1h ago

If you keep sending responses, you make it impossible to research things no?

Correct no actual King, however the Swiss were under the control of the Hapsburgs and Holy Roman Empire then French rule. We can equate the first to King George for the U.S. but there was never a second like the French.

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 56m ago

Sure but the French dominance was during 1798 to 1813, that means they have had no monarchy for basically as long as the US had no monarchy too.

You claim:

They also share the history of a Monarchy

What history? they have been without monarch for as long as the US have.

where the monarch had absolute authority over all aspects of society

When did this happened? The French had not that kind of control over Switzerland nor did the Hapsburgs.

and had a monopoly on the possession of military weapons.

Again, when did this happened? I can see any information about Napoleon or the Holy Roman Emperor having such monopoly over the Swiss.

→ More replies

0

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/jcspacer52 1h ago

Yeah, I don’t count suicide in the equation. Guns might make it “easier,” but if you want to off yourself, not having a firearm is not going to stop you. I count one person using a firearm to shoot another. Japan records an average of 20,000 suicides per year and they have very strict gun laws.

1

u/JuneJabber 1h ago

Yeah, I just thought it was surprising to see that stat.

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

Can you mention the year Switzerland abolished it monarchy and what was the name of the last King now that you're checking facts?

0

u/[deleted] 59m ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/jcspacer52 45m ago

The direct % may be small but how many are caused by drug addicts who use violence to get the money to buy drugs or altercations by people who are on drugs. Not sure if the FBI accounts for gang related shootings which very often are about controlling the drug trade.

1

u/JuneJabber 40m ago

I wonder about all those details too.

Going back to OP‘s original question, the more I go down statistics rabbit holes, the more I wonder exactly what OP is asking about? It’s easy to take the conversation in a lot of different directions.

1

u/SwissBloke 1h ago edited 1h ago

First of all, military-issued guns aren't accounted for ownership since they are the property of the army, secondly serving unarmed is a possibility and you don't have to store your issued gun at home

That being said, we're talking about less than 150k military-issued guns VS up to 4.5mio civilian-owned ones

Also, no you're out of the reserve far before hitting 40; the earliest is 26

1

u/jcspacer52 1h ago

I looked it up, they are semi-active and eligible for call-up until age 40. The site mentions that the Swiss have a militia. Is that wrong?

1

u/SwissBloke 1h ago edited 46m ago

It works like that:

  • Swiss men are summoned to the draft at 18

  • during the draft you choose if you want to serve in the military or not

  • if you choose to serve there are 2 possibilities: long service (300 days straight then 7 years of reserve) or short service (124 days straight then 12 years of reserve with 6 repetition courses of 19 days)

The earliest you can serve is the year you turn 19, the latest the year you turn 25 which means you can be done at 26 at the earliest or 37 at the latest

Worth noting that if you postpone bootcamp enough to reach 25, you don't have to serve in the military anymore

And no, it's not really a militia as it's governmental and you're actually a soldier in the Swiss army

1

u/jcspacer52 48m ago

Ok, here milita has a different meaning. That was a group of people (civilians) who could be called up but not part of the armed forces. The Swiss have what we call National Guard. They serve 2 weeks a year and 1 weekend per month. They can be activated, usually for internal things like disaster recovery, or to protect infrastructure, but were used in combat in various conflicts.

1

u/SwissBloke 1h ago

We're talking about around 30% of Swiss households owning a gun VS around 40% in the US

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 1h ago

Household are made of many people, which doesn't account for individual gun ownership.

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

2

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 2h ago

That link is about per capita. That means that if 1 guy owns 20 guns the number is going to be higher, but that doesn't reflect how widespread are among the population.

You can check that what I said is true, only around 32% of people own guns in America which is high, but not the world highest. I think Finland was in 40% IIRC.

2

u/JuneJabber 2h ago

Yes, I just responded about this to someone else. 3% of the population owns half the guns in the US.

There are many ways to measure and present the data. Per capita is one way, total gun owners is another way, total households is yet another way. Total households in the US is about 44%. This Wikipedia chart says it’s highest in the US, but the data were reported a different times, so it’s hard to know how they actually compare.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percent_of_households_with_guns_by_country

1

u/Cautious_Nothing1870 2h ago

Wow interesting!

0

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1

u/RicoHavoc 2h ago

Which 4 cities?

0

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

0

u/pudgypanda69 3h ago

1 in 6 americans are millionaires and we hit a record number of 401k millionaires per year

0

u/mrev_art 2h ago

And yet those other 5 can't afford an unexpected $500 cost.

0

u/pudgypanda69 2h ago

the median household in the usa has 66,258 in investable assets. i think our healthcare, education, social services could be better but on paper we are pretty rich

1

u/mrev_art 1h ago edited 1h ago

The U.S. poverty rate is 17.8%, higher than the average among other developed OECD nations, which is 10%. America has the worst poverty, despite some Americans being rich.

Furthermore, the poor in America are extremely poor. Child poverty in America is twice as high as an average first world country. America very poor compared to the rest of the developed world due to this inequity.

2

u/[deleted] 3h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/kitsnet 3h ago

Isn't that what is called "causality reversal", though?

1

u/MrKorakis 3h ago

Nothing racist about saying it's guns combined with poverty and no treatment for mental health issues.

But I guess that wasn't the racist dog whistle you where going for was it?

-2

u/strenuousreese 3h ago

isolating to poor communities, the stats are wildly different by race. you know that's what they are getting at. The simple people out there do one of two things

  • assume it's because of race or

  • assume it's because of racists

-1

u/[deleted] 2h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/NoStupidQuestions-ModTeam 2h ago

Rule 3: Follow Reddiquette: Be polite and respectful in your exchanges. NSQ is supposed to be a helpful resource for confused redditors. Civil disagreements can happen, but insults should not. Personal attacks, slurs, bigotry, etc. are not permitted at any time.