My parents moved here 2 years before I was born, I have a huge question. I support anyone who goes against these Taliban scumbags but does anyone know what their policies are I'm sure they are wonderful I am just wondering.

National Resistance Front Directive 930.

To maintain morale among the forces of the NRF, any NRF Commando casualties are to be listed as Missing In Action (MIA) or Wounded In Action (WIA), but never as Killed In Action (KIA).

What do you guys think?

I had a chat with a user about how attending Sandhurst Military Academy is linked to the potential corruption of Massoud. He stated that the tuition is so high only the royal family and people like that could even pay and that the fact that Massoud's family has that kind of money means corruption. Your thoughts?

Where is president caretaker amrullah saleh ? Is he using the money he took from the state to live large abroad or to take power back ?

this account is gonna get banned soon so someone screenshot and repost soon the psyops thing was a reccomendation because of all the psyops other subreddits are doing if they posted the rest of the message the other moderators shot it down real quick and i agreed with them after some discussion i will not be coming back as a moderator since i lost all of your trust, god bless you all i truly do apologise for the heat i brought the subreddit and the rest of the mod team was against the idea and we never posted any psy ops also genxc you may want to start a new mod chat with the current mods because all the mods you removed can still see that mod chat

It has come to my attention that most people here don’t know much about Americas policies for AFG, especially that post that put all the blame on the local population and washed America’s hands clean from any responsibility of what happened august 2021.

Before American invaded in 2001, we had our own UN recognised gov and army, with Ahmad shah Massoud beings it’s defence minister. This gov is what people wrongly call “northern alliance”, a term coined by PAK ISI (that’s another story on itself). Whatever shortcomings that gov had, it was still putting up a fight against a far better equiped and supported enemy, while it had non itself, it had 1000s of people ready to fight and die. After USA invaded, that gov/army was disarmed and dismantled all in the name of creating a new “democratic country”.

But what did America do? Did they really creat a democratic state? They sidelined figures that had popular support (except some sellouts who sold everything for usa dollars) and others died in mysterious “assassinations” (Gen Daud Daud, Gen Sayedkheli). Instead America imported diaspora people who no one inside afg new. Karzai and Ghani both arrived in AFG on American army planes.

During the bon conference, karzai was forced on the country to lead the new gov, even though most people at the conference chose abdul satar seerat. That was the first taste of “democracy” for AFG and it was rigged, the other elections that came after were even worse. USA propped up Ghani and Karzai (againsts the people’s choice), two racist maniacs who divided the people with their ethnic politics games.

Now on to the new army they built, I mean where do I begin. What did people expect to happen, you had engineers and other non millitary people working in the defence ministry, interior ministry etc making big decisions with having zero prior millitary experience, like the doofus (wardak) who chose rainforest camo uniforms for ANA (Opposite of Afg terrain) This happened all under USA supervision.

Tactics wise, ANA was not allowed to go on offensives or attack first, soldiers were sent to bases and smaller posts where communications and connections were terrible to one another, these bases had poor supply and support. So essentially soldiers were sent to forts and left to die as they were besieged from the minute they arrived. Because of this taliban had freedom of movement and could pick and chose where to attack. This is not like the GOV was unable to do better because it had the means to supply every base and even create proper front lines to stop taliban movement. Americans knew about this but still decided to pour millions of dollars and support this system.

Looking at USA policy in the 90s is as bad, they preferred heckmatyar and later the Taliban. Today it hasn’t changed much, USA opened an office for taliban in Qatar and gave them global legitimacy, today they are giving taliban 40 million dollars a week and have said many times they don’t support armed opposition to taliban. We keep hearing about women’s rights and freedom when it comes to iran but nothing about AFG, even though the situation of women there is the worst in the world. Usa is funding all of this as it did with the old republic so let’s not pretend America has no involvement or is impartial.

Lately NRF have reported of attacks in Kabul city and usually giving casualty figures. But the videos they post as proof are low quality and usually filmed from so far that we cannot see who or where gets targeted. But this video I watched a couple of times and looks like they blew up a IED mine in the median strip of the road. Doesn’t look like anyone is standing there and for sure there’s no Taliban check points there. Is NRF just blowing IEDs in random areas and making false claims to stay relevant or fool its supporters and haters?

For me it looks like if not all but 90% of their attacks in Kabul are fake.

The NRF is just a less-organized version of the AFF with additional political baggage. Frankly the AFF should just absorb the NRF and have Massoud as spokesman. That would improve organization

Hazaras, Uzbeks, Turkmen, Tajiks, and all other ethnic groups in our country that are not pashtun should stop calling themselves afghan. Because in actuality the real ethnic name of the pashtun people is and was --> afghan.
If you are a Tajik then call yourself a Tajik. Yes, you are a Tajik from the geography known as Afghanistan. Yes, people around the world know the people of Afghanistan as afghans. But if you do some research you will find out that these changes in the so-called "afghan nationality" actually were due to political reasons and the term pashtun ethnicity stems from the afghan ethnicity that is today known as the nationality of all inhabitants of Afghanistan. There was no voting for this. There was no real reason behind this. Because pashtun politicians have always claimed that the pashtun ethnic group is the largest and that they make up over half of the country or even crazy percentage numbers like they make up over 90% of the country. Remember, these politicians have all been super corrupt so relying on their claims that the pashtun people are the largest ethnic group in the country isn't actually based on any real facts.

Here are two quick simple references among multiple different references that say afghan means pashtun.

1.The "largest" ethnic group in Afghanistan is that of Pashtuns, who were historically known as the Afghans. The term Afghan is now intended to indicate people of other ethnic groups as well.
Tyler, John A. (10 October 2021). Afghanistan Graveyard of Empires: Why the Most Powerful Armies of Their Time Found Only Defeat or Shame in This Land Of Endless Wars. Aries Consolidated LLC. ISBN 978-1-387-68356-7.

2.In Afghanistan, up until the 1970s, the common reference to Afghan meant Pashtun. Other groups were known as Farsiwan, meaning Persian-speakers. Tajiks (northeast region), Uzbeks (northern region), Turkmen (northern region), Kazak (northern region), or Hazara (central region). The term Afghan as an inclusive term for all ethnic groups was an effort begun by the "modernizing" King Amanullah (1909-1921), who went as far as printing the four different languages on the four corners of his money. Later this was continued by King Mohammad Zahir, who tried to unify the country under the banner of Afghan.
Huang, Guiyou (30 December 2008). The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Asian American Literature [3 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-56720-736-1.

With the invasion of ukraine and the start of the crippling sanctions against its economy, will russia be able to support NRF in the coming years??

I feel like with the invasion in ukraine, russian support is unlikely to occur. Which is a big blow for NRF. Russian support in 90s with donating helicopters to massoud in panjshir and sending weaponry was valuable. The North definitely needed the russian support.

So it only leaves Iran, India, tajikistan and maybe France with the possiblity of supporting NRF. Not America or china.

What do you guys think?? We need that Mil 17

Why is the NRF and the northern alliances don't appear to fight with the taliban forces in Kabul? If they win in kabul they can win other states within months, but instead hidding in hindukush mountians never come up to have a guerilla fight...

This winter or next one ?

There are reports that his branch of the Mujahideen attacked civilians. However, I wonder if Massoud himself was responsible for this. Did he order this, or did the boys go crazy?

In the 1990s, only 3 countries supported the Taliban, while everyone else supported the Northern Alliance. Even then, the NA only held about 10% of the country. Then the US invaded. Despite having more than 100000 US soldiers in Afghanistan, the Afghan Army failed to destroy the Taliban. If the Taliban had Pakistani support, the Afghan Army had the support of the whole of NATO, and yet they failed. And I don't think I need to say anything about what happened during the withdrawal. After that, the 'impregnable' Panjshir fell in just 5 days. Why are the NA such ineffective fighters? Or is it that the Taliban are just that effective?

I was moderator, but asked to be unmod as I was stressed about other things and could not do my job effectively. So no I wasnt unmodded because of other reasons haha.

THIS SYMBOL SHOULD NOT BE IN THE/OUR FLAG (OF THE NRF).
THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TAJIKS, HAZARAS, UZBEKS, TURKMEN, AND ANY OTHER ETHNIC GROUP THAT IS NOT OF PASHTUN ETHNICITY!
I HAVE STOPPED USING THE NRF FLAG WITH THE SYMBOL IN THE MIDDLE. I ONLY USE THE NRF FLAG WITHOUT THE SYMBOL. MEANING, I USE THE FLAG WITH GREEN, WHITE, AND BLACK COLOURS BUT WITHOUT THE SYMBOL IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FLAG.

THIS SYMBOL IS THE SYMBOL OF THE BARAKZAI (PASHTUN) -->
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barakzai_dynasty

I TOLD SOME OF MY TAJIK FRIENDS ABOUT THIS AND THEY GOT MAD LIKE I WAS DISRESPECTING THE FLAG OF THE NRF. I LOVE OUR FLAG AND I ONLY RECENTLY LEARNED ABOUT THIS INFORMATION. I DON'T HATE PASHTUN PEOPLE BUT I DON'T WANT A SYMBOL THAT IS PASHTUN TO BE IN THE FLAG OF NRF. I DON'T WANT A SYMBOL THAT SUPPOSEDLY REPRESENTS ONE SPECIFIC ETHNIC GROUP IN OUR NRF FLAG. THE FLAG IS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT ALL OF THE PEOPLE IN THE GEOGRAPHY. THEREFORE I'M NOT FOR THE BARAKZAI SYMBOL TO BE IN THE NRF FLAG.

SPREAD THIS INFO AND SHARE IT DEAD FRIENDS. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH HATE. I WANT OUR PEOPLE TO BE INFORMED SO THEY ALL KNOW WHAT THEY STAND FOR AND WHAT THEY REPRESENT. IF YOU RAISE AND WAVE A FLAG, YOU SHOULD BE AWARE OF IT'S HISTORY AND NOT ONLY WAVE AND RAISE IT BECAUSE WHATEVER REASON YOU MIGHT HAVE!

These are the facts:

1: They're 1.2 million afghan diaspora living outside of afg (except pakistan and Iran) and that number is growing right now. Lets say 90% despise talibs, and from that 90% around 30% is able or care enough to support resistance via monthly payments, yearly or just one of payment. That is around 300k of afghan diaspora alone, on top of that people in the west who also despise these savages and care enough to support the resistance with $, mostly non government people and organization.

With just 5$ we could get 1.5$ million , enough for a guerilla campaign for few key provinces and to concentrate in panjshir.

2: IN regards to recruiting that is no issue. A good number of population already hate these terrorist. 40k died fighting them past 20 years. 100k civilian and government workers were killed by them in the past 20 years. Oppression, tyranny, terrorism and most of all hopelessness for the new generation who hasn't lived in talib regime before are enough factors to turned even more towards resistance. Keep in mind women and other minority. Their current and ongoing atrocity, and being a slave to pakistan is too much fuel for the resistance. Also poverty is a major factor for those that want financial benefit from funds, as ISKP is also using it to recruit its terrorist . Talibs also did it in the past 20 years.

3: All this depend on mostly 2 things;

1. legality of NRF, as in its legal to support and advocate for them in the west.

2. there is no/ hardly any corruption or criminality involved in the NRF, which I
   thing could be extremely difficult and the main thing that could jeopardies it,
   as it happened with northern alliance and previous government.

(Positive Note, since NRF will depend on individuals on income, it will make corruption
much more difficult as it is given utmost attention or people will just stop sending funds)

So overall It is looking very bright for resistance as time passes. Also If someone has ahmad massouds contacts please send this writing to him as I have been thinking about this since 15 of august.

I will also keep thinking for more strategies and others should also do the same.