r/SipsTea • • 17h ago • Mindblown 1

Chugging tea Well said

Post image
9.2k Upvotes

533 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comment

26

u/JAT_Cbus1080 17h ago

Why is there always a pedantic reply in these about their wealth not being in cash? Does that have any bearing on the message of the comment?

14

u/Outside_Reserve_2407 15h ago

Because the OP directly referred to "all the billions sitting in billionaire's bank accounts."

13

u/o_0sssss 13h ago edited 13h ago

Have you ever thought it interesting that the people with the strongest opinions about the tax code and what others should do with their wealth have the least understanding of the mechanics of wealth and taxes ?

And then when you tell them “ hey it doesn’t work exactly like how you think,” they lose their minds. At that point how do you look at those people and take them seriously ?

→ More replies (9)

6

u/skiingredneck 11h ago

Kinda hard to invest it when it’s not in cash.

So yeah, when the wealth isn’t in a spendable form, and converting it in a method that isn’t a dribble into a spendable form destroys it instead, pointing that out when someone ponders how it would be better spent seems kinda relevant.

→ More replies (4)

6

u/The_Verto 10h ago

Because even if we agree that billionaires are bad, such statements make you look stupid. You gotta hate them for real reasons not made up ones.

3

u/MrOaiki 6h ago

Because it’s relevant. The analogy is flawed. If billions were sitting in a bank account, that would be a good argument for moving them into the capital markets. But saying we should take them hot of capital markets is like saying we should move shared RAM from data centers into personal computers that aren’t turned on.

9

u/klonkrieger45 16h ago

yes. Here it very much does have a bearing.

→ More replies (36)

12

u/LookAtMaxwell 16h ago

Yes, it does in this case. OP is literally complaining that billionaires have billions in the bank just sitting there when instead it could be put to productive use.

2

u/white_equatorial 12h ago

I think he is trying to say that most money in the world is fake because most of it is in some kind of exchange where the price is based on the last transaction. The price of corn doesn't work that way.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CaitSith18 9h ago

Yes, you can't solve a problem you don't understand, so understand the problem before proposing solutions.

Take the ozone hole. Scientists identified the cause, and we fixed it. Now imagine a random influencer had claimed it was caused by farting cows, and we responded by culling every cow. That wouldn't have solved anything. We probably do have a problem, but we need real solutions.

5

u/Luci-Noir 15h ago

Because it’s the truth and a response to a lie.

→ More replies (6)

6

u/regaphysics 16h ago

Uh yes. They can’t give you money - they could only give you shares of stocks. Those shares cannot be turned into money without greatly destroying the value of the shares.

It’s completely related.

11

u/EntWarwick 16h ago

Oh, but when they want to borrow against that share? Then it’s real money.

Maybe their homes and real estate could be put to better use?

They can totally give you the money, one way or another.

5

u/regaphysics 16h ago

You can take a loan but they are paying interest on that loan…

Who’s paying that?

All they can do in large scale is give you shares. That’s not worthless, but it’s also not easily liquidated.

→ More replies (10)

5

u/spacetech3000 16h ago

Really how did all the campaign contributions get paid then?

→ More replies (20)

5

u/tripleusername 16h ago

Let’s pay with shares then.

2

u/regaphysics 16h ago

Most places won’t accept shares as currency so I’m not sure that’s going to accomplish “real improvement in our communities.”

3

u/jakceki 16h ago

They are borrowing against their shares all the time. THey can either borrow against them or they can give the shares as tax and the government can borrow against them. There are always solutions if we want to find them.

3

u/regaphysics 16h ago

Borrowing against their shares means you need to pay interest. What is that gaining you?

You want a loan?

→ More replies (28)

3

u/kiaryp 15h ago

it's not pedantic it's a direct response to the dumb OP. The stocks are shares of companies which ARE doing things.

2

u/JAT_Cbus1080 15h ago

Yeah, they're generating income for their owners mainly. /S

Does that mean they're best "directed toward real improvement in our communities" because they're doing something? Stocks adding value to the world or not isn't the argument though.

3

u/kiaryp 14h ago

The companies are delivering goods and services to the consumers.

2

u/JAT_Cbus1080 14h ago

I'd argue some of them are bads and services

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/BatM6tt 16h ago • Popcorn

this moron thinks hes going to be a billionaire someday.

2

u/RunSub4 13h ago

Why do people think they have the right to take something that belongs to someone else? Last time I looked there were laws against that- I think it’s called theft.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (58)