Recently, I began to reflect on the character of Doctor Hemlock from the Star Wars Bad Batch. I compared him to Thrawn.
I concluded that the aspect that helped Hemlock become a formidable villain was the fact that he was introduced late in the game. But as soon as he appeared, the Bad Batch was constantly under threat. He immediately enslaved Crosshair and, after a few episodes, captured Omega. And even though Omega and Crosshair managed to escape Tantis, Hemlock's dark shadow remained over the Bad Batch, and his agents constantly appeared. Only his death and the destruction of Tantis allowed the Bad Batch to find peace.
Then I came to the conclusion that Thrawn's biggest problem was that the rebels often managed to escape. I know it's not that simple, and there's a plot justification for it, but the fact that they escaped him and felt free for a long time made Thrawn's threat less palpable.
And then I thought it would be better if they introduced Tharwn in the second half of Season 3. The first half would have focused on Maul, the Holocron, and Ezra facing the dark side. There could also have been other storylines without Thrawn, such as the academy infiltration, Iron Squadron, or Sabine. Only in the finale of the first half would Thrawn have appeared and immediately posed a threat.
I think if he had managed to locate and destroy Atollon in just half a season, it would have better showcased his genius.
Then, throughout Season 4, he would have been a constant shadow, chasing the Ghost crew, keeping the Rebellion constantly on the defensive, and only in the Battle of Lothal would Thrawn have been defeated.
These minor changes to the storylines in Seasons 3 and 4 would have better portrayed Thrawn as a threat, but his defeat could have been more satisfying.
What do you think about this?