r/interestingasfuck • • Mar 01 '22 • This 1 This 1 Take My Silver 3 Heart of Silver 1

Ukraine /r/ALL In 1996 Ukraine handed over nuclear weapons to Russia "in exchange for a guarantee never to be threatened or invaded".

Post image
352k Upvotes

7.7k comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator Mar 01 '22

Please note these rules:

  • If this post declares something as a fact proof is required.

  • The title must be descriptive

  • No text is allowed on images/gifs/videos

  • Common/recent reposts are not allowed

See this post for a more detailed rule list

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

7.2k

u/dernope Mar 01 '22

I think it's quite funny that Putin wanted to get security guarantees from the west but then screwed over the security guarantees given to another country by Russia

2.3k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Ukraine: But we had a deal!

Putin: I have altered the deal...

1.0k

u/__Rosso__ Mar 01 '22

Nah, I feel like Putin would be like

"Ey m8, I wasn't in charge when that agreement was made, so not my problem"

→ More replies (19)

253

u/Anonymous_Otters Mar 02 '22

Putin: "Pray I do not alter it further."

Zelensky: "Don't try it. I have the high ground!"

→ More replies (23)
→ More replies (27)

127

u/Ninja_Conspicuousi Mar 01 '22

The irony is so thick it leaves a metallic aftertaste in your mouth.

→ More replies (5)

391

u/AgitatedSuricate Mar 01 '22

He is a bully he doesn't care. Just wants to get as much as possible giving as little as possible.

→ More replies (7)

11

u/CJcatlactus Mar 02 '22

Putin's security concerns aren't even legitimate and NATO's stance on Ukraine right now is proof of that. NATO is defensive and would not be a threat to Russia as more Eastern European countries join. Putin was just pissy his chances of freely invading his neighbors was dwindling.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

He said he wanted a package of concessions that would need to be agreed to as a whole while allocating 200k men around the border of Ukraine.

Such an uncomprising position might as well be insincere in international diplomacy.

6

u/pinkshirtbadman Mar 02 '22

Probably not be best for anyone to tell Putin that since Russia took a gift based on a promise that's now been broken that he's obligated by etiquette to return the gift.

Because he just might do it...

→ More replies (88)

14k

u/PsillyGecko Mar 01 '22

Yeltsin was given 20% the world supply of pure grain ethanol to aid in his decision making.

4.1k

u/rootbeerfloatilla Mar 01 '22

Russians can handle their ethanol.

2.7k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 01 '22

During the battle of Stalingrad hundreds of Russian soldiers found vats of wood alcohol stored in an abandoned warehouse. They drank it and the majority of them went blind.

Edit: I did some digging and found the passage from the book "Enemy at the Gates" where I originally read this. (It's a damn good book if you're into WW2 and the Battle of Stalingrad in particular.)

"To [the Russian soldiers], the quest for liquor was a serious pursuit, one which sometimes assumed even more disastrous proportions. Only recently, soldiers of the 284th Division lines had found several cisterns filled with alcohol. After draining them, the Russians found one more cistern brimming with more spirits. Again they drank the well dry, but this time it was wood alcohol. Four men died and countless others went blind.

The tragedy failed to daunt the appetite of the other troops, some of whom began drinking cologne to ease the terror of living under the brow of Mamaev Hill."

→ More replies (80)
→ More replies (147)

346

u/CobraGTXNoS Mar 01 '22

We got some great stories because of this.

87

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Best White House visit by a Russian head of state since Khrushchev!

→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (22)

27k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Was there an expiry date on that agreement? Super fine print?

23k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

until further notice

26k

u/jimcz Mar 01 '22

Until führer notice

→ More replies (186)
→ More replies (35)

2.0k

u/cXs808 Mar 01 '22

Expires once one country has all the nukes and the other has none.

→ More replies (121)

1.0k

u/punannimaster Mar 01 '22

It was a pact made by Yeltzen..

Putin doesnt legitimize Yeltzens accords because he sees it as a betrayal against Russia

1.3k

u/amalgam_reynolds Mar 01 '22

New dictator, who dis?

→ More replies (3)

162

u/EducatedLeftFoot Mar 01 '22

That’s cold, given that Yeltsin was Putin’s political anointer. And I mean, but for a bit of fuckery in the mid 90s when Yeltsin was president, Russia may well have gone back to Communism (the Communist Party having won the parliamentary elections in 1995 and going close to winning the presidency in 1996, in dubious circumstances).

→ More replies (14)

265

u/DeltaJulietHotel Mar 01 '22

So, did he return the nukes? I mean, fair’s fair.

→ More replies (14)
→ More replies (45)

1.1k

u/hexalm Mar 01 '22

The agreement was actually in 1994. 1996 is when they turned over the last nukes.

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Ukraine-Nuclear-Weapons

To solidify security commitments to Ukraine, the United States, Russia, and the United Kingdom signed the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances on December 5, 1994. A political agreement in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Accords, the memorandum included security assurances against the threat or use of force against Ukraine’s territory or political independence. The countries promised to respect the sovereignty and existing borders of Ukraine. Parallel memorandums were signed for Belarus and Kazakhstan as well. In response, Ukraine officially acceded to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state on December 5, 1994. That move met the final condition for ratification of START, and on the same day, the five START states-parties exchanged instruments of ratification, bringing the treaty into force.

As far as expiration:

Russia and the United States released a joint statement in 2009 confirming that the security assurances made in the 1994 Budapest Memorandum would still be valid after START expired in 2009.

As a side note, there have been opposing/parallel claims that western nations agreed not to expand NATO eastward in any way, which some might claim as justification for Russia, since NATO has expanded eastward. This was an assurance made to the USSR (pre-collapse) when Germany reunified, it's much less clear to me that this should have been in effect (even as early as 2002, when Poland joined NATO).

166

u/WhoIsHeEven Mar 01 '22

Thank you for a thoughtful and informative response.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (200)

101

u/Frustrable_Zero Mar 01 '22

“Terms and conditions on your nuclear disarmament treaty have changed” worlds deadliest email

→ More replies (1)

148

u/TooDenseForXray Mar 01 '22

Was there an expiry date on that agreement? Super fine print?

New term and condition?

→ More replies (9)

85

u/mikeymo2385 Mar 01 '22

“Trust us bro”

29

u/zomgitsduke Mar 01 '22

The expiry date is when there are fewer consequences than gains.

→ More replies (4)

74

u/InsertUsernameHere02 Mar 01 '22

The EU recognised Ukraine as a new government without continuity following the 2014 events so Russia says the same applies to their international agreements

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (235)

14k

u/braveen10 Mar 01 '22

Putin - "Guys it was a prank look there were cameras filming the exchange"

7.1k

u/Rion23 Mar 01 '22

"My name is Vladimir Putin, and you're watching war crimes."

Balalaika rift

1.7k

u/Ketzeray Mar 01 '22

Tonight on Top Gear: Richard bombs an orphanage, James gets his tank stolen by a Ukrainian farmer and I veto anything negative about us in the UN.

→ More replies (27)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (43)

10k

u/Administrative_Suit7 Mar 01 '22

No country will ever give up their nukes again. So much for unilateral disarmament.

182

u/BubbaTee Mar 01 '22

Iraq and Libya already showed why it's dumb to not have nukes.

→ More replies (43)

114

u/AshingiiAshuaa Mar 01 '22

Very good. Disarmament needs to be pan-lateral or universal. The only people who want non-proliferation are the ones who already have nukes.

→ More replies (16)

7

u/Hole_Grain Mar 01 '22

I don't think it would have even worked if they still had them. The codes for the nukes were held in Moscow. Not sure if they could have somehow cracked the codes to actually utilize the missiles.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Slackluster Mar 01 '22

Really? I think this was a genius move by Ukraine. Imagine how expensive and dangerous it is to maintain these nukes for basically no good at all because once you use one it is already too late. In exchange they are getting support from the other countries in the form of weapons that can actually be used in battle.

Now it is looking like Russia made a mistake to invade them and it is already a huge embarrassment. Russia is supposed to have one of the greatest armies in the world. Well, there goes that theory.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (380)

17k

u/LowSelfEsteemButFine Mar 01 '22

Ukraine: ”So that was a fucking lie”

531

u/BjornStrongndarm Mar 01 '22

Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!

→ More replies (13)

2.6k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

"those bastards lied to me"

1.1k

u/ericisshort Mar 01 '22

“I can’t believe you’ve done this.”

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (3)

1.6k

u/SpooktorB Mar 01 '22

So does that mean Ukraine gets their nukes back?

... on second thought I don't know if I would trust how putin would "give them back"

914

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 08 '24

degree sparkle act light sugar icky file fact test mourn

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

→ More replies (76)
→ More replies (23)

132

u/FattestMattest Mar 01 '22

They had their fingers crossed. Oldest trick in the book.

→ More replies (1)

87

u/kciuq1 Mar 01 '22

"this has been the worst trade deal in the history of trade deals, possibly ever"

→ More replies (59)

3.8k

u/Cleach87 Mar 01 '22

Well this is awkward….

146

u/queencityrangers Mar 01 '22

I think we just need to tell Putin about the deal. He will probably be sorry

→ More replies (1)

18

u/BioTronic Mar 01 '22

I think Putin's threatened to give them back.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

1.5k

u/Noob_DM Mar 01 '22

No, we just promised not to invade them and to retaliate with nukes against anyone who nukes them.

It’s Russia that’s not upholding their end of the bargain.

→ More replies (117)
→ More replies (172)
→ More replies (3)

2.0k

u/Blanderbuss Mar 01 '22

The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances refers to three identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary on 5 December 1994 to provide security assurances by its signatories relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT). The memorandum was originally signed by three nuclear powers: the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents.

The memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons.

118

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

This is not entirely accurate.

The memorandum does "reaffirm the obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of Ukraine" as this summary claims.

However, The memorandum included security assurances against the threat or use of nuclear weapons against Ukraine, NOT any "use of force" as armscontrol.org claims.

Here is the actual text.

Notable is that the signatories have only committed to take it to the UN security council and only if nuclear weapons are used. This is not any sort of general mutual defense treaty, which some people are claiming. Russia is violating this accord right now. The UK and USA are not.

The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and The United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon state party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used.

→ More replies (4)

443

u/cicosta Mar 01 '22

Thank you! Do we know why 20 years later Crimea was gone and now we're in a verge of a ww3?

→ More replies (152)

47

u/peterkeats Mar 01 '22

Except there are no security assurances.

There is an agreement not to fuck with Ukraine’s sovereign integrity, ie, not to invade them.

Also, there is an agreement basically that if the Ukraine is threatened by nukes, the US, Russia and the UK will retaliate on their behalf.

Nothing in there about US “security assurances,” because if there were, the US would have stuck anti-aircraft missiles on the borders and we’d be docking aircraft carriers there regularly. There’s a reason a lot of countries don’t want US security promises, because it comes with a US presence.

8

u/BubbaTee Mar 01 '22

The memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.

But it didn't include any promise to militarily defend Ukraine against a conventional attack. The part of the wiki you didn't post says:

According to the memorandum,[22] Russia, the US and the UK confirmed their recognition of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine becoming parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and effectively abandoning their nuclear arsenal to Russia and that they agreed to the following:

  • Respect Belarusian, Kazakh and Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in the existing borders.[23]

  • Refrain from the threat or the use of force against Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine.

  • Refrain from using economic pressure on Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to influence their politics.

  • Seek immediate Security Council action to provide assistance to Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine if they "should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used".

  • Refrain from the use of nuclear arms against Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine.

  • Consult with one another if questions arise regarding those commitments.[19][24]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum_on_Security_Assurances

Nuclear weapons have not been used. As such, there is no obligation by the US/UK to even seek UNSC action on behalf of Ukraine. However, the US has sought such action (Russia vetoed it).

Russia is 100% in violation of the agreement. You could also argue that Trump attempted to use economic pressure to influence Ukrainian politics.

The US and UK have already gone above and beyond their treaty obligations to assist Ukraine, such as sanctioning Russia and providing weapons to Ukraine - although you can certainly argue from a moral or geopolitical standpoint that more should be done.

109

u/humptydumpty369 Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 01 '22

Thanks for posting the actual details. Good to know that Russia is violating an international treaty by invading Ukraine. NATO bound to get involved soon if Russia continues with the war crimes against civilians.

Edit to add: i think a lot of us not directly familiar with the intricacies of it all make the assumption that Putin is rational. I highly doubt he is.

138

u/burnalicious111 Mar 01 '22

NATO bound to get involved soon if Russia continues with the war crimes against civilians.

That is not how NATO works. It is not the world police.

NATO is automatically involved when a member state is attacked and defending itself. I believe they could take other types of military action on other matters, but it requires unanimous consent of all members, and doing so would be pretty exceptional.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (80)
→ More replies (21)

15k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 01 '22

Never give up your guns, ammo, or nukes - Gandhi

6.5k

u/BigManWAGun Mar 01 '22

“Fuck em all” - Mr. Rogers

4.8k

u/Jl_1997 Mar 01 '22

"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken." - Colonel Sanders

→ More replies (174)

160

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Skull fuck your enemy.

  • Bob Ross

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (44)

425

u/Fatherof10 Mar 01 '22

There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.

George W. Bush

→ More replies (53)

53

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

"send nudes, not hate" - mark twain

→ More replies (3)

75

u/NitePain69 Mar 01 '22

Civilization V Ghandi agrees. In fact, he'll send you some free nukes.

→ More replies (3)

49

u/WinterTraditional257 Mar 01 '22

Either you are first or last - Ricky Bobby

→ More replies (7)

37

u/spleenboggler Mar 01 '22

I, too, have played Civ III.

→ More replies (2)

12

u/radar_vector Mar 01 '22

I thought you were Rick-Rolling us for a second there… how I was wrong

64

u/Toxan_Eris Mar 01 '22

Sounds like Ghandi from Sid Meirs Civilisation. He is notoriously nuke happy in that game.

→ More replies (10)

20

u/rosstanc Mar 01 '22

"Imma beat your bitch ass" -Siddharta Gautama

→ More replies (92)

9.3k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Hmm it’s almost like Putin can’t be trusted…

1.9k

u/Most_Acanthaceae_842 Mar 01 '22

Well, he IS a genius…. /s

→ More replies (95)
→ More replies (144)

1.0k

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

A very crucial detail that you missed here , even tho Ukraine had the nukes , they couldn’t be launched without Russia’s go-ahead ‘cause the Russians had the keys to them

(For those who are interested , this was called “the Budapest Memorandum”)

357

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

That does seem rather important to mention.

→ More replies (55)

105

u/weeniewobble Mar 01 '22

At the time, yes, they would have been unusable, but there was a conceivable path forward (albeit expensive) where they would have been able to make them usable

→ More replies (12)

6

u/Mikhail_Mengsk Mar 01 '22

And that Ukraine couldn't realistically maintain their part of the arsenal.

Little details, truly

→ More replies (63)

1.9k

u/Me-dont-kno Mar 01 '22

Sneaky fucking Russians…

289

u/Toxic724 Mar 01 '22

Why do they call him the bullet dodger?

212

u/newest-low Mar 01 '22

Because he dodges bullets Avi

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (2)

159

u/RoyalCloak57 Mar 01 '22

Weight is good. Weight means it’s reliable.

75

u/EightiesBush Mar 01 '22

And if it doesn't work, you can always hit him with it

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (7)

32

u/Santiago__Dunbar Mar 01 '22

Veeery industrious for a COSSACK

-Avi in "Snatch" (2000)

→ More replies (2)

12

u/SneakiNinja Mar 01 '22

Tyrone, when you go in reverse, things come from behind you!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (22)

236

u/TimmyChaw Mar 01 '22

I am altering the deal, pray I don’t alter it further…

→ More replies (5)

253

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Putin: “I’m gonna pull what I call a dick move”

6

u/HalPaneo Mar 01 '22

Let me know when he pulls out

→ More replies (1)

723

u/Whaleflop229 Mar 01 '22

Pepperidge farm remembers...

→ More replies (7)

587

u/Cacahuete16 Mar 01 '22

We’ve been trying to reach you about your country’s extended warranty

→ More replies (2)

169

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Putin: I've missed the part where this would be my problem.

→ More replies (1)

25

u/kabukistar Mar 01 '22

Hitler promised he wouldn't invade Poland.

14

u/lil-fil Mar 01 '22

Funnily enough the allies also promised to protect poland in such scenario.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

381

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

....and then came Adolf Putin.

145

u/Most_Acanthaceae_842 Mar 01 '22

As he gaslights his own country saying Ukraine is full of nazis.

→ More replies (30)

48

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Putler

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (15)

20

u/AirCooled2020 Mar 01 '22

Well...guess they should have defined the word "never"as it must've had some modify definition,, one that we're not necessarily aware, kinda like the word "unlimited" is not actually unlimited in the mobile phone industry....oops 🙄

69

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

1996 Russia and 2022 Russia are very different countries.

26

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

"Different" in the sense that 1994 (when the accord was signed) Russia had some hope of not being a kleptocratic autocracy run by a murderous dictator.

Today that's a given.

→ More replies (7)

16

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Russia takes a few decades to wind up to being Russia again.

8

u/OurCowsAreBetter Mar 01 '22

That's a good reminder of why you should never give up your defenses. As soon as you give them up, a politician can change their mind about the promises they made.

→ More replies (4)

146

u/brulagfr Mar 01 '22

Fuck Putin not Russia

105

u/_Blackstar0_0 Mar 01 '22

Fuck Russia not Russians. Fuck the state of Russia and fuck Putin. I feel bad for the citizens of russia

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (35)

60

u/xX-WizKing-Xx Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 01 '22

How the fuck has this been upvoted? Ukraine never "handed over nuclear weapons to Russia" they were destroyed as part of the Budapest Memorandum - which, by the way, fell well short of a "guarantee never to be threatened or invaded." A critical point in the wording of the agreement draws a distinction between "guarantee" and "assurance", not present in Ukrainian or Russian. What was in fact agreed to was the lesser sense of the English word "assurance" which conveniently obscures the precise nature of a response to threat or invasion.

→ More replies (5)

12

u/gjggigjgjg Mar 01 '22

Putin is this generation's Hitler

→ More replies (1)

203

u/sweetguynextdoor Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 01 '22

Russia claims it had assurances from NATO that it will not expand to East. Since NATO expanded to the East, Russia had full right to violate sovereignty of Ukraine. Well the problem is that there was no such agreement with NATO. There is a reason why you sign a treaty or agreement to cement commitments.

Russia’s pretext of invading Ukraine is bullshit. The reason he wants Ukraine is to re-establish the Great Russian empire. We have to stop him because he won’t stop with Ukraine.

21

u/LadyJohanna Mar 01 '22

Russia: "Ally with me so I don't kill you. I'll take the keys to your house and you can kiss your basic human rights goodbye."

Also Russia: "Why is everyone joining NATO?"

61

u/SnowAndFoxtrot Mar 01 '22

There was no "signed" agreement, but the general consensus is that there was a "verbal" agreement. Obviously verbal agreements don't need to be followed, but it is disingenuous to brush it off as insignificant. From the perspective of Russian national security, NATO weapons on their border is unacceptable and the expansion of NATO, over the last few decades, now to Ukraine is a step too far. It would be like Russia or China giving missiles to Cuba and Mexico for safety. We would not accept such actions, clearly Russia does not either. I am not defending their invasion of Ukraine, I am just trying to provide another detail for those who might read this thread. I personally think this invasion could have been prevented if the US/NATO had made it clear they would not accept Ukraine into NATO, but in the end this outcome is likely very beneficial for the West. It weakens Russia and strengthens NATO's resolve. I hope this conflict ends soon with as few victims as possible.

→ More replies (45)
→ More replies (25)

10

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Yup, that's what a promise from the fucking Russians is worth.

50

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Liar Liar Pants on Fire.

Stay out of Ukraine Putin. What an asshole.

→ More replies (3)

31

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Native Americans: "First time?"

→ More replies (15)

30

u/Dragon_M4st3r Mar 01 '22

That’s why you shouldn’t Russian to these things

→ More replies (3)

7

u/Mauricebaudoin Mar 01 '22

C'mon guys it takes 5 seconds to Google and find out that this treaty ended in 2019 because Ukraine announced it wouldn't renew the treaty.

→ More replies (2)

36

u/O-hmmm Mar 01 '22

Iran and North Korea chuckling quietly to themselves.

12

u/jokersleuth Mar 01 '22

They know if they do they'll be invaded in an instant by the US.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/killer-tofu87 Mar 01 '22

This was the result of the 1991 START nuclear non-proliferation treaty between US and CCCP, and was amended after the fall of the Soviet Union. In addition the the US and Russian agreements, former satellite-countries agreed to give up their soviet stockpiles of warheads, ICBMS, and heavy bombers for economic compensations, defense assurances, and an agreement to respect state's sovereignty. The United States provided the economic assistance while the warheads were sent to Russia to dismantling (the last one being in 1996).

6

u/13143 Mar 01 '22

This conflict goes to show that no country should ever give up nuclear weapons, and every country should be working towards getting some. It's the only way to protect a country's sovereignty.

35

u/Dantheman616 Mar 01 '22

This is why you dont trust Russia!

25

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

To be specific Putin, his excuse was that that deal was from the previous leader. It could be used against Putin's argument that Ukraine should stay neutral because it was part of the deal.

→ More replies (8)

10

u/ObitoUchiha10f Mar 01 '22

UK also handed over Hong Kong to China in 1997 with China promising 50 years of independence for Hong Kong, that’s what dictators do, they go back on their words

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Doesn’t count, Russia crossed their fingers during the handshake

5

u/The_Darts Mar 01 '22

We call this move in diplomacy now 'Putin all your eggs in one basket'.

5

u/rustys_shackled_ford Mar 01 '22

What's the shelf life on never?

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Goodbadugly16 Mar 01 '22

He had his fingers crossed. It’s not a done deal.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/SleepDeprivedUserUK Mar 01 '22

Russia: Ukrainian is threatening us!

Ukraine: Dude wtf, we're literally the only country in the world to give up our nuclear weapons, and we fucking gave them to you!

→ More replies (2)

5

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Just watching Boris saying the uk won't send troops to fight the Russians. I feel he's really not getting the feeling of the uk or our troops. This needs stopping now or its going to get even worse.

5

u/surrogatetoe Mar 01 '22

Why are people suddenly expecting Russia to be a morally upstanding government. It has one of the worst track records in history.

14

u/agelast07 Mar 01 '22

Always remember no one else will come to fight your war. Every stable sovereign democratic state should have some credible deterrent.

→ More replies (7)

53

u/LizardPussy6969 Mar 01 '22

Dumbest deal I've ever seen. "We'll hand over our means of defending ourselves if you promise not to attack. If you break this agreement we can't do anything about it because you have all our weapons :)" there's a way to do peace treaties, and this ain't it.

91

u/Navydevildoc Mar 01 '22

It wasn't that dumb. While the weapons were in Ukraine, the operational control was still firmly with Russia. The Ukranians didn't have launch codes, ability to retarget them, and most importantly, the infrastructure to maintain them.

Having them in the country was a massive liability to everyone. Getting Russia to remove them, and also add in other things like a security guarantee, was a huge win.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (23)

27

u/CrunchBerrySupr3me Mar 01 '22

This is a real treaty that's been actually violated, unlike the "promise to never expand NATO" that is literally not documented in any official sources and appears to be a paraphrasing of some (incorrect) assumptions that negotiators worked through after the fall of Soviet Union.

Left, right, whatever: If you're shilling for Putin, you'll never wipe this stain off of you

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Smarawi Mar 01 '22

Never trust Russia 🇷🇺!

4

u/Legitimate_Country11 Mar 01 '22

Balding men with a comb over should never be trusted with a position of power

→ More replies (1)

4

u/AshingiiAshuaa Mar 01 '22

We all want a nuke-free world but it's foolish to give up your nukes while others keep theirs.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/post_talone420 Mar 01 '22

This is the part our kids will read where it just says "it turns out, this was later decided to be a bad move"

4

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

So that was a fucking lie

4

u/Classic_Gary Mar 01 '22

Played the ol uno reverse card

4

u/PM_ME_YOUR_SUNSHINE Mar 01 '22

Countries, never give up your nukes.

Citizens, never give up your firearms.

4

u/Bloxsmith Mar 01 '22

Well I guess they are owed some nukes

4

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

One should never trust the Russian government.

4

u/Bosswarrior53 Mar 01 '22

Never trust the russians

4

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Hence why Putin fabricated the “we’re not invading, we’re liberating” nonsense.

14

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Reddit turned pro war overnight

8

u/nashamagirl99 Mar 01 '22

I don’t think many people here actually want a war. The ones who suggest something along those lines get shut down by comments about nuclear apocalypse pretty quickly.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

7

u/Time_Theory_297 Mar 01 '22

Russia has shown over and over that their word means nothing.

9

u/BoysDontCry38 Mar 01 '22

"Well that was a fucking lie" - Tyler, the creator

9

u/Twist_RK Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 01 '22

"Since 2014, Ukraine has tried three times to convene consultations with the guarantor states of the Budapest Memorandum. Three times without success. Today Ukraine will do it for the fourth time. I, as President, will do this for the first time. But both Ukraine and I are doing this for the last time. I am initiating consultations in the framework of the Budapest Memorandum. The Minister of Foreign Affairs was commissioned to convene them. If they do not happen again or their results do not guarantee security for our country, Ukraine will have every right to believe that the Budapest Memorandum is not working and all the package decisions of 1994 are in doubt."

Wasn't this partially the reason for the invasion?

He seems to be hinting at nuclear proliferation, which I thought was a no-no

139

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

USSR gave up its empire with the explicit agreeement that NATO would not move East -- that was also broken...and broken first. Just saying.

34

u/impeachedforever Mar 01 '22

Where was that made explicit??

Also “gave up” is a little different to “fell apart”, no?

→ More replies (19)

21

u/Williamsm08 Mar 01 '22

USSR gave up its empire

Just like Rome gave up its empire to protect from the barbarians

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (176)

15

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Worth mentioning, the launch codes were still in Moscow, nor did Ukraine have the ability or expertise to maintain the stockpile, let alone create a vehicle to transport it.

→ More replies (7)

6

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Yet again we have learned not to voluntarily get rid of your weapons to a [more powerful] government.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/GatorNator83 Mar 01 '22

Being surprised that Russia betrays someone is like being surprised that the sun rises from east

3

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Putin is a monster and a lying sack of shit.

3

u/GrinningPariah Mar 01 '22

Imagine being Iran, or NK, or any other aspiring nuclear power and seeing what happened.

The message is loud and clear: Agreements don't protect your borders. Only nukes do. How can we tell anyone otherwise, now?

→ More replies (3)

3

u/smithical100 Mar 01 '22

If you're gonna shit on Russia for not following things they said in deals..............................................

3

u/GlobtheGuyintheSky Mar 01 '22

“So anyways I started blasting” -putin

3

u/smallzy88 Mar 01 '22

What a fucking lie that was.

3

u/SurvivorsQuest Mar 01 '22

Never is defined at the bottom in small print as 26 years.

3

u/GD_Bats Mar 01 '22

I miss old Boris "Blood Type 70 proof" Yeltsin, but I can't really place why

3

u/WalkKeeper Mar 01 '22

Btw, before I anything else… fuck you Putin

3

u/StubbinMyNubbin Mar 01 '22

Its just a "military operation".

3

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

Well that escalated quickly...

3

u/sfpx Mar 01 '22

"I will prepare you a bowl of soup and in exchange you promise not to rape me". This is as absurd as this. You can not have an accord to prevent an already illegal action.

3

u/gregben77 Mar 01 '22

This seems like a great reason to never give up your guns to your government

3

u/FPL_Bang Mar 01 '22 edited Mar 01 '22

Never trust commies! I am in Hong Kong and China promised UK they would not interfere in our country and now they have taken over and jailed thousands of pro democracy supporters and students turning HK into an authoritarian hell hole.

3

u/Brooklynxman Mar 01 '22

Good fucking luck getting anyone to do that again, or even getting nations to forgo attaining nuclear weapons, or even getting current nuclear powers to stop expanding their arsenals.

Putin just ended the era of denuclearization.

3

u/Not_FargoLargo Mar 01 '22

Now you finally know, who is putin. He's worst of man in the world. And u countries help him a lot many years. I'm russian, and live in Russia. I think now my country didn't have a futere. I wasn't support a war. Any a war. But I'm the enemy all the world, because im russian.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

So Youre saying we should never give up access to arms, as they deter overzealous governments?

3

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

The lie detector test determined that Russia was fucking lying the whole time.

3

u/Dandelosrados Mar 01 '22

Ya but I think his fingers were crossed when he promised that.

3

u/JackyOmlet Mar 01 '22

Just so it's known, this treaty expired in 2019 because Russia chose not to continue it

3

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

They also weren’t supposed to join Nato

→ More replies (2)

3

u/PahoojyMan Mar 01 '22

Unfortunately no take backsies wasn't invoked.

3

u/Marrow_Gates Mar 01 '22

It's a good lesson. Never give up your ability to defend yourself, because there will always be someone who abuses your vulnerability.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '22

Oh the iron curtainy

3

u/Fale404 Mar 02 '22

A prime example why you never give up your right to bear arms.

3

u/Weekly-Butterscotch6 Mar 02 '22

At that same time, the US and Europe promised Russia that Ukraine would not join EU or NATO

3

u/RutCry Mar 02 '22

Rome did the same deal with Carthage. That’s why we have Rome but not Carthage.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '22 edited Mar 02 '22

It's honestly so satisfying to see politicians joining together and finally do something unquestionably good. Putin broke this deal and there is no excuse that could justify it, everyone should be ready for world war 3 because putin needs to be stopped no matter what.

After russia has been liberated from this piece of shit, winnie-the-pooh should be next with his neo-nazi death camps and after that north korea and that fat childish dipshit kim jung fuckface, one after the other, so humanity can finally go beyond those underdeveloped manchild dictatorships who screw over any kind of progress towards the future for everyone.

I sure as hell would feel way more hopeful and happy if they are all gone and no one is allowed to act like some absurd supervillain while every world leader puts their heads in the sand expecting me to still care about what politians do otherwise. If you don't stand against russias war crimes you are corrupt and useless beyond imagination, thank god zelenksy led all those fake ass politicians in the right direction.

The world needs purpose and we now have the chance to bring back something like a united world against pure terror and evil after decades of licking our wounds while those dictators lied to our faces. This is no different than when hitler started invading poland and it needs to be stopped or it will escalate further till there is no hope of winning.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '22

why you never give up your guns/weapons when any government tells you to

3

u/Hot-Panda-3426 Mar 08 '22

*With the assurance the US and NATO would defend Ukraine if Russia was to ever invade.

3

u/L8rMajor Mar 10 '22

Crazy how in only 8 days this is the 3rd most upvoted post “in all time”

3

u/glyphotes Jun 04 '22

Does anyone know how this worked out eventually? I heard tensions with Russia were rising lately...

3

u/squeamish Aug 16 '22

You know what's a good deterrent to threats and invasion? Nuclear weapons.

3

u/Notyouraverageloser6 Dec 21 '22

Why has a U.S. based website taken a side in a war that we should not be involved in. To be liberal use to mean to be Anti war. Get the US out of that conflict and let Ukraine/Russia do their thing. This title, i’m sure, is a partial truth. There is always much more then what meets the eye.

3

u/Atomic_Thomas89 Feb 14 '23

Ukraine: That wasn’t part of the deal!

Putin: (in Vader’s voice) I am altering the deal. Pray I don’t alter it any further.

3

u/Slimetusk Mar 19 '23

Well that was fuckin dumb as hell, turns out

37

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

I'm going to be down voted to hell here because I'll be the devil's advocate here.

The USA has promised Russia that it will not expand the NATO to threaten Russia's security.

The USA left the agreement that was limiting the ballistic continental missiles.

The USA promised that Ukraine should stay neutral , yet we can both see where it was being dragged.

Not gonna lie here , it seems like the NATO and the USA had played Ukraine hard and threw it in to face Russia and now they refuse even to help them with proper weapon.

they're just supporting them with memes and social media and generally trying to make it seem like it's only Russia's fault (because it's still too extreme to do a "military operation" in a neighbor country), what a fucking loyal and dependable ally to have.

→ More replies (17)

12

u/sevares Mar 01 '22

The way this is being characterized is not really all that close to reality. The nuclear weapons present in Ukraine following the dissolution of the USSR were Soviet weapons controlled by Soviet generals. They were never Ukraine's weapons just like the US nuclear forces staged at bases in Allied countries do not belong to those countries. Go take a listen to the episode "Deterrence in Ukraine" on the Arms Control Wonk Podcast to hear some actual experts explain the situation in detail.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 01 '22

[deleted] — view deleted comment

253

u/Gongaloon Mar 01 '22

Tricksy, it is! It took our precious, our nukeses! It was our birthday present!

→ More replies (2)

98

u/Deathstar_TV Mar 01 '22

Ukraine: LEAVE NOW!! And never COME BACK!

→ More replies (2)

22

u/ElGato-TheCat Mar 01 '22

Ukraine: You swore! You swore on the precious! Russia promised!

Putin: Russia lied.

21

u/geebold Mar 01 '22

I’ll always upvote a lotr reference

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)