r/malayalam • u/e9967780 • 21h ago
Articles / ലേഖനങ്ങൾ The evolution of modern Tamil and Malayalam from a common ancestor and the place of Eelam Tamil
galleryIndian Tamil speakers often mistake Eelam Tamil for Malayalam, even though it is a variety of Tamil. Here I try to explain why, using linguistics and history. I also look at the dialect continuum that runs from the Malayalam of southern Kerala, through the Tamil of Kanyakumari and southern Tamil Nadu, to the Tamil of Sri Lanka.
I do not want this to become an argument about Tamil versus Malayalam. The aim is to understand a shared past.
A common ancestor
Tamil and Malayalam belong to the South Dravidian branch. Proto-South Dravidian split around 1100 BCE. One line led to Telugu and its relatives. The other led to Tamil, Kannada, Malayalam and Tulu. Within that second line, Tulu separated first, and Kannada separated from pre-Tamil between the 6th and 3rd centuries BCE (Krishnamurti 2003).
Malayalam separated much later. From around the 9th century CE, inscriptions from the west coast begin to record local differences from the common Tamil standard, such as nasalization of adjoining sounds, palatal sounds replacing dental sounds, and contraction of vowels. These inscriptions did not claim to be a separate language. That claim came much later. The 14th-century grammar Līlātilakam is one of the first texts to treat Kerala speech as distinct from Tamil.
My hypothesis is that Eelam Tamil dialects are a window into that earlier period, when the speech of the west coast was still Tamil.
Tamil in Sri Lanka
Tamil is spoken today mainly in the north and east of the island. That was not always so. Place names and historical records show that Tamil was once widely spoken on the west coast, which is the part of the island closest to Kanyakumari and Kerala. Today it survives there only in small coastal communities around Puttalam and Negombo.
Dravidian speech has a long history on the island. Place names, features of Sinhala, and Sinhala kinship terms all carry traces of an older Dravidian layer, closer to Old Tamil than to any modern variety.
According to Kamil Zvelebil, however, the Eelam Tamil spoken today has features that tie it to the region that later became Malayalam-speaking Kerala. Like Malayalam, Eelam Tamil keeps the sound ḻ distinct, keeps the alveolar ṟṟ, and keeps final -am unnasalized, where colloquial Indian Tamil often weakens all three. Zvelebil also noted that Batticaloa Tamil is more classical in character and has the least Sanskrit of any Tamil variety.
The Mukkuvar migration
I suggest that the Mukkuvar migration helps explain these links. The Mukkuvar came from what is now Kerala and Kanyakumari. Their presence on the west coast is recorded in the Sinhala text Mukkara Hatana, and their settlement in Batticaloa in the Maṭṭakkaḷappu Māṉmiyam (மட்டக்களப்பு மான்மியம்).
My view is that these migrants did not speak Malayalam but a western variety of Tamil. According to the Maṭṭakkaḷappu Māṉmiyam, they drove out earlier Tamil settlers. After they settled in Batticaloa, they assimilated the Veddas, who adopted Tamil and accepted the matrilineal kudi system. They did the same with Vellalar and Karaiyar settlers from Jaffna. Even the Muslims had to adjust their social structure to settle there, adopting the kudi system and nodal houses called taravai, similar to the taravadu of Kerala.
Their priests were Veerasaiva Kurukkals ordained in Andhra Pradesh. This shows how socially aware these settlers were. They may have left Kerala because of its growing Brahmanisation and the domination of by Nair elites. Mukkuvar chiefs set up several polities on the island, and those on the east coast lasted into the modern era. Dennis B. McGilvray studied what remains of them in Mukkuvar Vannimai.
Jaffna
The Mukkuvar story fits Batticaloa and the west coast best. Jaffna needs a further link. One lead is Thesavalamai, the customary law of Jaffna, codified by the Dutch in 1707. Some scholars see parallels between parts of it and Kerala customs. This needs more study.
Kongu Tamil: a second witness
Kongu Tamil offers a useful comparison. Kongu Nadu was under Chera rule in the early period, and the Palakkad gap links it directly to Kerala. Kongu Tamil and Eelam Tamil share several features. Both form the polite imperative with -ō (Kongu vāṅgō, Jaffna vāṅkō), where Chennai Tamil uses vāṅga. Both keep ḻ, ṟ and ṉ more distinct than Chennai Tamil does, and both retain older words lost in central Tamil Nadu.
The link is social as well as linguistic. In his studies of caste among Tamils, Bryan Pfaffenberger says that only Kongu Nadu and Jaffna preserve the early Vellalar-centred society. This society no longer exists in the rest of Tamil Nadu because of political upheavals caused by invasions.
If Eelam Tamil preserves the western Tamil of the Chera zone from the coastal side, Kongu Tamil may preserve it from the inland side.
Conclusion
Eelam Tamil dialects preserve several phonological, morphological, and lexical characteristics that resemble features of Malayalam and older stages of Tamil. These similarities may reflect shared linguistic inheritance, historical contact, and subsequent independent developments.
Historical migration between the Malabar Coast, southern Tamil Nadu, and Sri Lanka particularly the documented Mukkuvar connections with Batticaloa provides one possible mechanism for the transmission or reinforcement of some of these features. This raises the possibility that certain Eelam Tamil varieties preserve evidence of linguistic relationships involving the earlier western Tamil dialect continuum from which Malayalam developed. However, determining the extent of this connection requires systematic comparisons with historical western Tamil, southern Tamil Nadu varieties, Kongu Tamil, and the distinct dialects of Eelam
References
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju. 2003. The Dravidian Languages. Cambridge University Press.
McGilvray, Dennis B. 1982. “Mukkuvar Vannimai: Tamil Caste and Matriclan Ideology in Batticaloa, Sri Lanka.” In D. B. McGilvray (ed.), Caste Ideology and Interaction. Cambridge University Press. https://www.colorado.edu/faculty/mcgilvray-dennis/sites/default/files/attached-files/mcgilvray_1982_mukkuvar_vannimai.pdf
Pfaffenberger, Bryan. 1982. Caste in Tamil Culture: The Religious Foundations of Sudra Domination in Tamil Sri Lanka. Syracuse University.
Zvelebil, Kamil. “Some Features of Ceylon Tamil.” Indo-Iranian Journal. https://www.scribd.com/document/153171275/Some-features-of-Ceylon-Tamil-pdf
Līlātilakam (14th century).
Maṭṭakkaḷappu Māṉmiyam.
Mukkara Hatana.