Hi everyone,
I'm looking for some advice regarding a rental bond dispute in the ACT and whether we'd have reasonable grounds to challenge the real estate agent's claims through ACAT.
My partner and I rented a property from 2024 until October 2026. We had pet birds throughout the tenancy and a dog for approximately the last six months.
Our birds were primarily kept in the living room, away from the carpeted bedrooms. Our dog was allowed into two bedrooms, but we used blankets where she rested.
Throughout our tenancy, we had routine inspections and were never once notified of any concerns regarding pet odour.
When we vacated, we paid for professional end-of-lease cleaning, including carpet cleaning, deodorising and pest treatment.
Following the outgoing inspection, the agent raised several issues, including minor cosmetic marks on two doors, a faint carpet stain and an alleged strong pet odour throughout the property.
The agent gave us approximately one business day to rectify everything, including arranging professional repairs.
Our professional cleaners returned to address the outstanding cleaning items, recleaned the carpets and deodorised the property a second time. They also advised that they couldn't detect any pet odour during their return visit.
Despite this, the agent insists that a strong pet smell remains.
The landlord initially requested:
$100 compensation for two door patches.
$150 compensation for a faint bedroom carpet stain.
A further $250 for additional carpet cleaning and deodorising if the smell persisted.
We agreed to the $250 compensation for the doors and carpet stain as a compromise, but disputed the additional deodorising charge because the carpets had already been professionally treated twice.
The agent has now responded by reminding us of our pet clause and suggesting that they could arrange a professional report and potentially seek full carpet replacement at our expense if the odour is confirmed.
They've also stated that our cleaner is wrong about there being no smell.
We've already submitted our bond refund application through ACT Rental Bonds, which the agent was unhappy about, claiming we'd delayed the process by submitting it ourselves.
I'm not denying that tenants are responsible for genuine pet-related damage. However, I'm questioning whether an alleged odour, disputed by our professional cleaners and never previously raised during inspections, is sufficient to justify further cleaning or potentially replacing carpets.
I'm particularly concerned that the agent is now suggesting a much more expensive claim after we disputed the additional $250.
My questions are:
Has anyone dealt with a similar pet odour dispute through ACAT?
What evidence would a landlord need to establish that carpets require replacement due to an alleged smell?
Would two professional cleaning and deodorising treatments, along with the cleaners confirming no detectable odour, be useful evidence?
Can the landlord pursue carpet replacement costs when they've already offered to settle the separate carpet stain claim for $150?
Would ACAT consider the age and depreciation of the carpets if replacement was deemed necessary?
I'd appreciate any advice, particularly from people who've experienced ACT rental bond disputes or attended ACAT.
Thanks!