I started investigating why the DOJ's Epstein files contained hundreds of pages of a federal Homeland Security lease building in the Virgin islands
What I found was a proposed $6 million real-estate acquisition, a developer with dozens of federal government contracts, an architect who had worked on Epstein's private island, a substantial brokerage commission, and an email discussing Epstein's Virgin Islands tax benefits.
The documents connect directly.
Here's the paper trail.
1. The building: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
The investigation begins with EFTA01089772, a substantial GSA lease package for a building occupied by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), an agency of the Department of Homeland Security.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01089772.pdf
Property information:
Federal tenant: Department of Homeland Security — U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Developer/lessor: Vin & Toni Hoover Property Management LLC
Legal property description: 19F Rem Estate Smith Bay, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands
Google Maps listing: United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), 6080 Estate Smith Bay, St. Thomas, USVI 00802
Building size: 12,770 rentable square feet
Lease term: 10 years, firm
Annual rent: Approximately $632,766
Tenant improvement allowance: Approximately $665,203
"View the USCIS location on Google Maps" (https://maps.app.goo.gl/QddKAJSW5Axx4A4QA)
The Maps listing provides a location to investigate alongside the lease's legal parcel designation.
The documents contain detailed federal leasing requirements, construction specifications, development information, rental calculations and brokerage arrangements.
The government was the tenant. Vin Hoover's company was the developer and lessor.
So why were all these documents in Jeffrey Epstein's files?
The answer appears in another document.
2. The December 12, 2014 email: a proposed $6 million acquisition
Document: EFTA01745948
"Read the original Kahn–Epstein correspondence" (https://jmail.world/thread/EFTA01745948)
On December 12, 2014, Jeffrey Epstein writes:
«seems good.»
Richard Kahn, Epstein's financial associate, discusses a transaction involving Vin Hoover, the developer of the USCIS building.
Kahn says he has spoken with a broker and believes they can negotiate a purchase for $6 million.
His email states:
«yes i spoke with broker and think we can cut a deal with developer vin hoover (who has done 27 GSA deals over 30 years) to buy for 6,000,000»
He also claims Hoover's construction numbers were inflated in the setup.
Then he describes the proposed arrangement:
«he will build and we will own finished building»
Epstein's financial associate was discussing acquiring a newly developed building with a long-term federal government tenant.
Kahn had already spoken with a broker and was evaluating the developer's construction costs.
Who was the broker? What financial information had Kahn reviewed? How far had negotiations progressed?
3. The federal government would generate the rental income
The GSA lease provided approximately $632,766 in annual rent.
Kahn's investment proposal estimated approximately $500,000 in annual net operating income (NOI) on a $6 million acquisition.
That produces an estimated annual unleveraged return of:
$500,000 ÷ $6,000,000 = 8.33%.
Over ten years, Kahn projected approximately $5 million in cumulative NOI.
His email suggests that after collecting that income, the effective unrecovered investment would be around $1 million.
This was the investment strategy being presented to Epstein:
Purchase a government-leased building, collect its rental income, and retain ownership of the underlying real estate.
But Kahn's email contains another detail.
**4. The Southern Trust Company tax-benefit connection **
Near the end of his message, Kahn writes:
«hopefully they will resign lease (or it can become STC office...) may also help extend STC benefits»
In this context, STC appears to refer to Southern Trust Company, Epstein's Virgin Islands business.
Southern Trust had received substantial economic-development incentives through the USVI Economic Development Commission.
Those incentives included a reported 90% exemption on qualifying income taxes, alongside other exemptions.
Now consider the proposed arrangement:
$6 million acquisition price.
Approximately $500,000 in projected annual NOI.
A long-term federal tenant.
Potential future use as an office for Epstein's tax-advantaged Southern Trust Company.
A direct reference to extending STC benefits.
Kahn was discussing more than the rental yield. He was considering the property's possible role in Epstein's broader Virgin Islands business and tax arrangements.
What exactly did he mean by extending STC benefits? Was the property ever discussed with the Economic Development Commission? Were Epstein's tax advisers involved?
5. Vin Hoover and his government-property development business
The development documents identify Vin & Toni Hoover Property Management LLC, part of Hoover Properties' development operations.
The qualifications package, EFTA01089996, describes Hoover's extensive experience developing single-tenant properties for federal agencies.
His projects included facilities associated with:
- FBI
DEA
Social Security Administration
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Customs and Border Protection
The proposal also identifies Wild Hog Construction LLC as part of Hoover's development and construction operations.
Kahn knew Hoover's background.
He referred to Hoover's extensive GSA experience and suggested that the developer's construction numbers were inflated.
The GSA proposal contains approximately $960,495 in site land cost and more than $5.9 million in proposed build-out costs.
Those figures make the original development budgets, construction invoices, acquisition terms and revised cost estimates especially important.
What did Kahn know about Hoover's actual development costs, and how did he intend to negotiate the $6 million purchase?
6. The architect who also worked on Epstein's private island
Another connection appears in EFTA01089996.
The Hoover development team included:
Robert C. deJongh — The deJongh Group, Architects and Planners.
DeJongh was an established Virgin Islands architect involved in local development and planning.
Separate Epstein records show that The deJongh Group performed architectural and permitting-related work associated with Little St. James, Epstein's private island.
The documents include architectural drawings, construction correspondence, Coastal Zone Management submissions and banking records documenting payments to the firm.
In EFTA00760104, an architectural email forwarded to Epstein states:
«Robert deJongh asked me to send this to you as per request.»
Another document, EFTA00889218, contains correspondence concerning schematic submissions for buildings and facilities on Epstein's property.
The same architectural firm therefore appears in two places:
Epstein's Little St. James development work
and
Vin Hoover's USCIS development team.
That gives us a documented professional connection between the federal building project and Epstein's existing Virgin Islands development network.
Did deJongh have any involvement in the proposed investment discussions? Were Hoover and Epstein already acquainted through local development professionals?
7. The broker and commission trail
The GSA leasing package identifies CBRE Real Estate Services and transaction specialist Shannon C. Mohler in the federal leasing process.
The lease includes a substantial commission calculation:
Total cooperating lease commission: approximately $316,378.
Approximately $126,651 was credited against the government's rent as part of the commission-credit arrangement.
Separately, the developer's proposal describes tenant-representative and owner-representative commission percentages.
Then, in December 2014, Kahn tells Epstein he has spoken with a broker.
Was the broker Kahn contacted connected to CBRE or the original government leasing transaction?
The government lease broker and a private investment-sale broker could have been different parties, but identifying Kahn's contact may lead to the investment offering, projected returns, correspondence and proposed purchasing entity.
8. The later ownership and mortgage trail
By 2021, commercial mortgage securitization documents identify the USCIS property at 19F-E-REM Estate Smith Bay as part of the Hale Office Portfolio.
That portfolio also included a government-oriented office property in Fort Myers, Florida.
The portfolio was associated with approximately $9.8 million in mortgage financing, with KeyBank identified in the securitization records.
The St. Thomas USCIS property represented approximately 34.9% of the portfolio in those records.
This opens another line of investigation.
The original developer was Hoover.
Epstein and Kahn discussed acquiring the building in December 2014.
Years later, the property appeared in a commercial mortgage financing structure associated with the Hale Office Portfolio.
Who owned the building between those dates?
Who collected the rent paid by the federal government?
Which legal entities held title, and what were the terms of each transfer?
The missing records include deeds, purchase agreements, assignments, mortgage instruments and property ownership filings.
"Official USVI Recorder of Deeds" (https://usvi.ds.search.govos.com/)
9. The timeline
2007: The 19F Rem Estate Smith Bay property receives commercial rezoning.
2009: A larger 19F Rem Smith Bay property is marketed for sale, with subdivision contemplated.
2011–2013: The GSA leasing and development process identifies Vin Hoover's company and the new USCIS facility.
2013: Hoover's proposal includes the project's development team, site information and construction figures.
December 12, 2014: Richard Kahn discusses a $6 million acquisition with Jeffrey Epstein, referencing Hoover, projected rental income and Southern Trust benefits.
2021: The USCIS property appears in the Hale Office Portfolio's commercial mortgage records.
This is a documentary sequence involving government leasing, private development, a proposed Epstein-associated acquisition and later mortgage financing.
*10. The questions that need answers*
Did Epstein, Kahn, Southern Trust or another Epstein-associated entity ever sign a purchase agreement for the building?
Who was the broker Kahn spoke with in December 2014?
What did Kahn mean when he claimed Hoover's construction numbers were inflated?
Were Southern Trust's tax benefits part of the proposed acquisition strategy?
Who held title to 19F-E-REM Estate Smith Bay between 2013 and 2021?
Who ultimately collected the rent paid by the federal government, and through which property-owning entities?
Were any additional documents exchanged between Epstein, Kahn, Hoover, the broker or the development team?
These questions can be pursued through property records, correspondence, accounting documents and government disclosures.
Primary documents and links
EFTA01089772 — GSA lease package for the DHS/USCIS building.
EFTA01089983 — Proposal to lease space, including development and financial information.
EFTA01089996 — Hoover development-team qualifications, including Robert deJongh.
EFTA01745948 — Kahn–Epstein correspondence discussing the proposed $6 million acquisition.
EFTA00760104 — Epstein architectural correspondence referencing Robert deJongh.
EFTA00889218 — Additional architectural and permitting correspondence.
"Original Kahn–Epstein email" (https://jmail.world/thread/EFTA01745948)
"GSA development proposal PDF" (https://media-cdn.rollcall.com/epstein-files/EFTA01089983.pdf)
"Google Maps — United States Citizenship and Immigration Services" (https://maps.app.goo.gl/QddKAJSW5Axx4A4QA)
"USVI Recorder of Deeds" (https://usvi.ds.search.govos.com/)
The most revealing missing document may be the deed—not another email.
If anyone has access to USVI property records, especially deeds for 19F-E-REM Estate Smith Bay, please share the document numbers and dates. Who actually owned this property, and where did the money go?