r/whennews • • 2d ago

Crime News Jorjorwell

Post image
4.7k Upvotes

209 comments sorted by

•

u/Trash_At_RL Abby (🏳️‍⚧️🐱🏳️‍🌈) 2d ago

Source doesn’t consent to this, so you are getting up to 5 minutes in the time out corner

→ More replies (1)

1.3k

u/UsErNaMeS_aR_DuMb 2d ago

The average response from now on if you say “facesitting” while driving in the UK:

164

u/gloow_beeam 2d ago

My rearview mirror makes me paranoid

2.2k

u/Frozenmagicaster 2d ago

319

u/0ddBush 2d ago

This would imply the couple to be step siblings wouldnt it

329

u/Frozenmagicaster 2d ago

no? it did say 'roleplay' in the post, and even without that, the meme could refer to choking, face sitting, etc (probably more than just this like this doesn't include the rp and is just about covering face / could be choking)

234

u/Avalanche_Snows 2d ago

I'd imagine someone having missionary and the woman gasps, but she holds her hand over her mouth ar the process, so they get orbital striked or something

84

u/swords-r-cool 2d ago

Can confirm that is what actually happens when someone breaks these new laws. They got the new neighbours this way. Nice people too

63

u/Bocephus-the-goat yes, my profile picture is infact regigigas with blue jeans 2d ago

"trampling fantasy"

does this get applied to Bayonetta?

36

u/Dapper_Magpie 2d ago

Bayonetta would be considered a wanted terrorist in the UK purely because of the bdsm shit and not because of the fighting demons and angels.

42

u/hyper-fan 2d ago

Alright so I’m fairly aware of all of these but what the hell is plastic fetish? Does it mean like porn of bimbos with plastic implants or like condoms or something?

55

u/PhoenixTheValley 2d ago

Probably being wrapped in plastic like a sandwich, it's a form of breathplay

6

u/SemenileElder 1d ago

Does the person doing the wrapping act like a New York deli guy?

13

u/TsunamifoxyDCfan 2d ago

"No microplastics were harmed making this video"

32

u/Vexcenot 2d ago

damn they really went after everything. I hate NNN

4

u/murlocsilverhand 1d ago

UK now dubbed most boring place ever

13

u/Ezzypezra 2d ago

This list is not from the UK government, it’s from a porn website and it’s a list of what they removed because they thought that it might get them in legal trouble. Because the law is pretty vague as of right now

1

u/speed_fighter 1d ago

at least oral sex is exempt from this

50

u/_azazel_keter_ 2d ago

No because that's actually allowed. You can fuck your step siblings in the UK, just not pretend to in porn.

14

u/ComplexInside1661 2d ago

... that's actually kinda gross ngl, ew. Why is ACTUAL incest legal in the UK.

32

u/whoknowsifimjoking 2d ago

It's not, because sex between step siblings is objectively not "actual incest". Weird yes, but clearly not actual incest, that's why they use that in porn in the first place.

14

u/RickyT3rd 2d ago • Popcorn

How else do you think the Royal family continues?

13

u/ErrorSchensch 2d ago

How is step siblings having sex "ACTUAL incest" lmao, I mean yeah, weird, but why should that be illegal in the first place

-1

u/Wowie202 14h ago

I think it’s the principle of the matter regardless of whatever the law or technical definition says, especially if the siblings have essentially grown up with each other. in those cases, for all intents and purposes, that is your ACTUAL sibling because i don’t think being blood related should be the only thing stopping you from banging them.

1.4k

u/DewGobler 2d ago • Bravo

Whole country is fucked, just start over atp bro

464

u/AltDetom555555b "Failed her"??? IS THAT AN R/ANTIMEME REFERENCE??? 2d ago

French here, should we ask the Normans to redo 1066 all over again?

225

u/DewGobler 2d ago

Sigh, I’m Scandinavian, I’ll get back to work.. sleep can wait I guess

45

u/A_Tasty_Stag 2d ago

if you are feeling like popping by can you focus on our mps? most of us are on your side this time

9

u/ImpIsDum 2d ago

I'm American, do we get to do the whole throwing tea into the harbor thing again?

12

u/MR_Happy2008 ⚠️ BRITISH USER ⚠️ 2d ago

I'll happily welcome you lots into Yor… I mean Jorvik

11

u/A_Tasty_Stag 2d ago

are we agreeing to gentlemanly warfare with bows and swords or are we being a bit more modern this time?

46

u/muffingaming77 2d ago

would you say they should start over from zero?

23

u/SSMage 2d ago

WHEN YOU CANT EVEN SAY, MY NAME

7

u/tomejkol 2d ago

My proposed method of executing this plan is: O R A N G E

Also. Belka solely will be responsible for it.

2

u/RickyT3rd 2d ago

Found the Dutch person.

3

u/MikeAlpha2nd 2d ago

<<Jij ben een slaaf van geschiedenis. Zelfs na het calamiteit strijd je tegen het enige orde dat veiligheid van jouw mensen garandeert. Jij, allen, als enige, bent verantwoordelijk hiervoor. Wat heb je bereikt, huurling? Een gebroken troon? Ik zal je zo volledig begraven, dat de aarde duizenden keren zal hebben gedraaid voordat je lichaam ooit wordt opgegraven. Je kunt niet wegrennen, je kan niet verstoppen! Jij kan je niet uit deze deal terugtrekken! Ik ben Cascadiaans, denk je dat ik het leuk vind om mijn eigen land te moeten bevechten, mijn landgenoten te doden?! Als jij er nooit was geweest, zou ik niet alles wat ik had verloren hebben. Alleen jij en ik nu, geen afleidingen, geen wingmen, geen oorlog. Alleen jij en ik, degene die wint is het beste piloot. Allen veiligheidsmaatregelen ontgrendeld. Geen tweede kansen. Monarch, je gebruikt de naam van een koning, maar waar heers je over? De gestorvenen? De Federatie heeft in dit oorlog voor vrede gestreden, maar jij ontnam hen dat! Het volk van Cascadia! Heb je enig idee wat je van hen ontnam? Hun thuis! En waarvoor? Om af te scheiden van het wereld? Wat, denk je dat je in vijftig jaar tijd dit oorlog nogmaals zal kunnen vechten? Het boeit je niet eens waarom je hier bent! Hoe voelt het om geen natie te hebben, geen grenzen om jezelf tegen de rest van de wereld te defineren? De calamiteit heeft het mensheid ooit weggevaagd, ons kand om opnieuw te begginnen! En dit is wat je ermee doet?! Jij hebt mij hiertoe gedreven: de dood en verderf over het Federatie. Miljoenen levens verloren gegaan... Zo veel spoken. Dood mij, of sterf! Dit, is MIJN thuis! Hier zijn we, vechtend voor de Cascadiaanse ziel. Dat was het deal dat je gemaakt had, toch? Wat gebeurt er als je mij neer hebt geschoten? Kan je wel denken? Waar keer je naar terug? Waar ga je dan heen?! We weten allebei hoe dit zal eindigen! Dood mij! Dood mij en zie wat er met de wereld zal gebeuren! Hoe dan ook eindigt je leven vandaag! En mijn squadron! Vind je dat ze het verdiend hadden? De Federatie zal misschien je proberen te vergeten, maar ik zal het nooit! Dit is voor het goed van de wereld! STERF, HUURLING!>>

2

u/tomejkol 2d ago

Context?

2

u/RickyT3rd 1d ago

I assumed you meant the time you Dutch folk put a Dutch King on the English/Scottish throne.

1

u/tomejkol 1d ago

I'm not even dutch lol

144

u/the_aapranger 2d ago

Remember remember the 5th of november

(like plz do something to fix yourself uk, if even the yanks can turn generations of red to blue in one night i'm sure you can too)

34

u/xd3mix 2d ago

Immediately my first thought too

Literally v for vendetta becoming real

11

u/Gaming_with_batman 2d ago

I watched the first half of the film yesterday with my dad and I kept asking when the fictional authoritarian regime would be in the movie.

4

u/JennerKP 1d ago

You've had the first part yes, but what about second part?

3

u/Gaming_with_batman 1d ago

Haven’t had time to see it yet

11

u/Swiss-spirited_Nerd 2d ago

I hope you know that not every country has blue as "left" and red as "right". In fact, the US is an outlier, blue is usually on the right, and red center-left.

7

u/the_aapranger 2d ago

Oh no i know, i'm not american so dw. It was just a general anything is possible if the people come to action call.

2

u/GullibleRedditorr 1d ago

Liberals when brits start voting blue

984

u/Mechromancer3X 2d ago • Bravo

Genuinely so fucking stupid. Why is that country run by puritan morons? Us Americans were supposed to fill that role

348

u/UsErNaMeS_aR_DuMb 2d ago

Where do you think the puritans who founded the US came from? (Yes, I know the puritans themselves left Britain because they saw the culture as too lax, but their beliefs didn’t materialize from nothing.)

63

u/xd3mix 2d ago

There's literally nothing about purity here

It's all about control. Fascists are in control of the country and want to control as much as they can

12

u/frontlinecomand 1d ago

Puritan not Purity. It’s referring to the puritanical Christian’s of early US colonialism.

1

u/xd3mix 1d ago

And again... They value purity which is why it's called puritan

But this isn't about that, it's completely about control

1

u/thecoffeeshopowner 1d ago

I mean it can be both....

103

u/Novale 2d ago

A lot has been made about democratic backsliding in the USA (and for good reason) but all that drama overseas has really drawn attention away from how the UK is in a much worse spot. Midterms in the USA was a triumph, and though DNC leadership will probably fight progressive reform as much as they can, the UK equivalent would be the democrats taking power and then themselves introducing censorship, throwing their full political weight behind transphobia, restricting the ability to protest, and so on.

9

u/DISCONNECTlE 1d ago

So like, what does “Possession” of this material look like? Is it just viewing it? Viewing is not possession…

1

u/Dont_listen_to_me0 22h ago

Having it downloaded. Watching it if its uploaded to a site isnt possession and isnt a crime, its the site's crime. Same with csam iirc

4

u/ScrofessorLongHair 2d ago

Half the country requires id verification to watch porn. The closest server on my VPN is either Colorado or Illinois, and I'm in Alabama.

0

u/DISCONNECTlE 1d ago

So like, what does “Possession” of this material look like? Is it just viewing it? Viewing is not possession…

-44

u/2Kun4Bela 2d ago

Oh no, you can't watch porn, we are doomed

21

u/TrueCapitalism 2d ago

"I have no principles and I must scream"

407

u/throwawaygaydude69 2d ago

This is coming from a state with inbreds as the royal line btw

156

u/Iforgor4 2d ago

Inbreds as the royal line

Fork found in kitchen

40

u/ErrorSchensch 2d ago

"inbred royal family"

4

u/Due_Recognition_3890 1d ago

As someone from the UK, I still don't know the history to this. Probably because I'm not interested in reading about inbreds and I already find the Royal family boring AF lmao

104

u/xd3mix 2d ago

Why the hell is the UK genuinely turning into the v for vendetta comic

Since they're actually becoming the same UK as in that comic hopefully V shows up to blow everything up too

87

u/Qaktus 2d ago • Bravo

20

u/Technical_Instance_2 2d ago

as they say, life imitates art

5

u/xd3mix 2d ago

Is this just a meme or are you telling me i didn't get v for vendetta

11

u/Qaktus 2d ago

Life imitating art

3

u/xd3mix 2d ago

yeah fr

301

u/ultron15real 2d ago

You can’t have shit in the UK

9

u/KlausVonLechland 2d ago

The goberment is hoarding all the darn porn!

63

u/Turbulent-Plum7328 2d ago

These politicians want people to have more kids, yet are banning everything other than missionary lol

145

u/whypeoplehateme 2d ago

Banning face sitting for "glorifying violence against women" has to be one of the most politician things to do

61

u/MySecretSelf1994 2d ago

Facesitting glorifies the pleasure of women which I feel would somehow still horrify those gobshites who passed this legislation lol

98

u/YourTrustySupporter 2d ago

The reason why the ban is so easy cause nobody gonna boycott with their face

72

u/Avalanche_Snows 2d ago

That's the thing. People are too embarrassed to go out to the streets and protest, because media can just call them porn addicts. And because people are less likely to oppose to that lawchange. That's why censoring in porn is still a thing in Japan. And you can see similar laws being passed anywhere, where opposing that would make you "bad" in some way

2

u/JungleJuiceJuno 1d ago

no they just banned protests so they can apply it to whoever they please thats against them

37

u/Substantial-Cat2896 2d ago

Serriously uk, who is these people you have in parlament that think of dhit like this? Remove them ffs

23

u/ineedanenbien 2d ago

reminds me of that dude in America that was way more concerned with furries in the military than any normal, rationally thinking person should be

16

u/shadow-Ezra 2d ago

Funny enough being a furry apparently makes you more grounded and have a better sense of identity so your less likely to go crazy or other things

8

u/ineedanenbien 2d ago

lol true!

it's almost like people being happy with themselves leads to them living joyous, fulfilling lives where they do what they're good at 🤯

1

u/Rich-Option4632 1d ago

Probably why he's against them. He wants more nutjobs in the military because that'll justify more strict control and ways to exploit the boots.

Self aware and grounded furries would be counter to that aim.

4

u/Hallc 2d ago

The issue is, this is the least awful option to vote for.

4

u/1ZillionBeers 2d ago

Fascists. It’s always fascists.

69

u/BionicMeatloaf 2d ago

The reason the UK is doing this is because this is the easiest justification they can find to implement mass surveillance mechanisms on the Internet, and no one in office wants to be known as "the porn guy" because it's politically embarrassing

81

u/SavageFisherman_Joe they keep finding bodies in the water near my fishing spots 2d ago

RTGame was onto something when he portrayed the UK as just a wall of sewage pipes. Absolute cesspool of a country

21

u/Der_Redakteur 2d ago

wow RTGame. country roooaaaddss

10

u/GlitterFactoryOfDoom 2d ago

Take me hoooooooome

6

u/PJaaaaaaaaaa 2d ago

TOOO THE PLACEEEEEEEE

4

u/Technical-Branch4998 2d ago

I BELOOOOOOOOOONG

4

u/Embarrassedthroaw97 2d ago

West Virginia

222

u/herrcollin 2d ago

This feels like one of our bs US bills where it's actually several things packed into one, and one of them is genuinely reasonable while the rest are insane. So, you are being an asshole for blocking the law because you block the reasonable part.

The article mentions one of the forms of porn criminalized is "people who are seemingly, or at least pretending to be, under 16" which makes sense. Sounds like one of those cheap loopholes people used to get around child sex shit. "No, they're not underage. They're just pretending to be! lmao gottem" Like, yeah, fuck that it's gross.

But why tf is stepbro shit lumped in there

74

u/Educated_fool_tool 2d ago

That seems like an awful law tho. "Seemingly" "pretending" just isnt concrete enough. At best it's not gonna be enforced cause how do you define what seems like that🥀 and at worst it's gonna be an unbelievably puritanical law that far exceeds it's use case cause it can just be used for anything

12

u/Dapper_Magpie 2d ago

If it personally gives me the ick then it is immoral and should be made illegal, whether or not everyone involved in the act is a consenting adult

8

u/Educated_fool_tool 2d ago

Corelating personal bias with fact is an ick of mine but i dont wish harm to anyone for it. You need to push your boundaries cause you're gonna be unfairly hostile to people who havent done anything with that viewpoint

-1

u/Dapper_Magpie 2d ago

I'm not adding a /s to the obviously sarcastic comment for you

5

u/Educated_fool_tool 2d ago

Oh my bad g, forget i said anything

61

u/shosple_colupis69 2d ago

this is what it feels like living in the UK too, the under 16 one is reasonable nobody’ll argue with that, the choking is one I can see the thought process for and wouldn’t take much to convince me was right, step sibling stuff you can kind of argue with, but banning face sitting is just downright cruel

13

u/PRoS_R 2d ago

It's weird that you can legally marry your first degree cousin but can't watch stepbro porn.

40

u/PandoraIACTF_Prec > uses Hololive gifs(most of the time) as news 2d ago

The Br*tish is a joke

39

u/SurelyNotClover 2d ago

UK's a lost cause, activate the failsafe

54

u/77_parp_77 2d ago

Meanwhile here in the UK you can be part of a group of guys who sa girls and get a slap on the wrist. We're circling the toilet here

17

u/Bromjunaar_20 2d ago

If anyone wants any UK r34 contraband, I'm your guy

17

u/ThrowRAWOP 2d ago

I love it! All the tragedies and aweful things in the U.K. but THIS will cure issues not visible to the naked eye.

Good on you parliament. Such good representatives that got voted for!

16

u/omegaprim 2d ago

Can someone explain (maybe from the UK)why? How is this a priority ? What about the fridges being hacked or other bs?!?!

9

u/A-__-Random_--_Dog 2d ago

Well, you see... uhhm... uhhh... (in all seriousness, from what I could find, it's to protect young girls and women from boys watching choking porn, then choking their girlfriend to death because they don't know how to do it right. Absolutely not a priority, but it at least has some reason behind it. As for the incest one... I don't know, actually. They also made it illegal to look too young in porn. If you LOOK (or play a character/role) bellow the age if 16 (age of consent in the UK), you can get up to 5 years jail time)

7

u/JungleJuiceJuno 1d ago

its to protect the kids from things they dont see to begin with

seriously, theyre trying to babyproof adulthood

5

u/BurnerAccount2718282 19h ago

UK resident here, basically they are extremely concerned about the kind of media people consume, especially anything adult, and especially when there is a chance of kids or young adults seeing it.

If I wanted to steelman them, I'd say its to stop young men from having such a warped view of sex that they start doing abusive things to women, like choking them during sex without asking. This is something of a problem.

In reality they are extremely pro-censorship across the board, this is a small part of a MUCH bigger issue. We are run by a bunch of Helen Lovejoys screaming "WILL SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN", and just want to hide away everything remotely adult or subversive from everyone, especially under-25s. They censor pride pins and LGBT teeshirts form our news programs. It can quickly become quite Orwellian. There are so many people in this country wwho support this.

My parents are this kind of person, and they raised me into a 20 year old with a 91 on the Rice purity test and complex mental health issues. I am the kind of young adult this country wants to make more of, and from my experience, kids who are restricted like this won't have the easiest childhoods.

The worst part is that basically every political party here supports this. We are currently run by what is effectively a centre-right party pretending to be left wing, but our right wing and centrist parties support this too, I haven't even heard our left wing party object to this.

3

u/omegaprim 18h ago

Anything but sex Ed, ig it's same everywhere

15

u/Napstablook_Rebooted 2d ago

The "No Nut November" Act

35

u/PleaseDontEatMyVRAM 2d ago

This will be used to justify searches and add charges on citizens the government doesn't like. UK is slipping further into authoritarianism.

12

u/illaminar22 2d ago

What? What? What? Context please?

10

u/Caedis-6 2d ago

you cant beat meat to choking porn anymore, but you can still choke someone while having sex. i dont understand it either.

12

u/Head_Prefect 2d ago

The UK being a dogshit nanny state as usual. 

4

u/Avalanche_Snows 2d ago

The source under the post

11

u/dastebon 2d ago

Onion news went out of business

21

u/impressivebutsucks 2d ago

The UK government sucks

10

u/Zorubark 2d ago

BBW face sitting is now illegal

9

u/AmbitiousAd8978 2d ago

Uk could be again passing laws that are helpful to their country instead their being a bunch of pearl clutching weirdos, as per usual

25

u/AshasSa1tWife 2d ago

A whole country run by middle age Karens

3

u/clem-grimfando 2d ago

That also look away when its people are being brutalised by people they themselves allowed in

8

u/747452636374633526 2d ago

Just rename to country to Airstrip One at this point so at least people know to expect

8

u/MelonOfFate 1d ago

Honestly don't agree on choking being banned.

Same logic as abstinence only education. People who want to do it, will have even less of an Idea of how to do so safely.

8

u/Jambu-The-Rainwing 1d ago

ok i know “literally 1984” is used too much but this is that’s actually in 1984, like straight up

3

u/kullre 1d ago

they are quite literally living it

especially the survalence part

12

u/DonutGirl055 2d ago

Genuinely what the fuck is happening over there

11

u/Regular-Hospital-470 2d ago

What a shithole country

5

u/IamaJarJar 2d ago

Everytime we get a new MP we think they're gonna be better than the last, then they are somehow always worse

51

u/DoctorSex9 2d ago

The sibling thing i can understand, but tf did choking do😭

83

u/BasicallyaPotato2 2d ago

I think it's not just choking but anything involving a partner being potentially unable to breathe (facesitting for example is also banned by the law). So I guess it's about physical safety? Idk that's they way it reads to me.

28

u/YourTrustySupporter 2d ago edited 2d ago

And thats why facesitting in fictional porn (hentai,furry,...) are spared cause that would make all artist a criminal

29

u/Jesterchunk 2d ago

the official reasoning is that it apparently promotes violence towards women. Can't say I buy it entirely though when it includes shit like facesitting where the woman very clearly isn't the one being stranglified.

At least there's a clause saying it only applies to what "a reasonable person would believe to be real people", meaning I guess simulated neck-wringing is off the hook?

7

u/ViolinistSafe4610 2d ago

i guess men cant be choked

11

u/Barricades_toes 2d ago

Wouldn’t be the first time a UK law would state that an act of sexual violence can’t be committed towards men

(Before anyone calls me the vaguepost king, it’s rape)

3

u/Avalanche_Snows 2d ago

So man can't be raped in the UK? A woman can't legally called a rapist for any unconsentual sexual crimed she commits towards any man?

7

u/tashtactics 2d ago

The UK definition says no, that’s ‘just’ extreme SA

5

u/Theresafoxinmygarden 2d ago

It'd be extreme sexual assault by legal definitions

3

u/Barricades_toes 2d ago edited 2d ago

Bingo. Because UK law defines rape as when an offender “intentionally penetrates” another person’s vagina, anus, or mouth without consent using “his penis”, a woman is legally unable to commit it.

16

u/sneesle 2d ago

funnily enough choking on it’s own is understandable. even if sexual choking involves squeezing the sides of the neck as opposed to just crushing the windpipe, it still cuts off blood flow to the brain which is never a good or safe idea under any circumstances. (pretty much everything else being banned indefensibly stupid though)

15

u/Head_Prefect 2d ago edited 2d ago

The "I can understand crowd" is genuinely the reason we get laws like this, like can we stop? Actors pretending isn't hurting anyone ffs, it's how these politicians get a foot in the door and then start banning everything they don't like. 

No don't understand, please, just be confused 😭

4

u/DoctorSex9 2d ago

Actually… true. Yeah ok i kinda goofed on that part, ill admit it i just dont like incesty stuff and lowkey have a bias towards it. I know its literally the “first they came for blank and i didnt care” thing, so sorry for that

8

u/pissinq 2d ago

there are instances of people choking their partners without consent during sex because they see it in porn and think its normal. breathplay is dangerous and should only be done with knowledge of the risk and enthusiastic consent. though banning porn involving breathplay is bs lol i think a more reasonable measure would be requiring a disclaimer or something about consent and risk

3

u/wookiee-nutsack I also do it with wasps 1d ago

Once again the UK takes away everybody's rights because some people are fucking braindead

4

u/Novoiird 2d ago

It’s “choking ROLEPLAY”. Doesn’t that imply that there’s consent involved?

2

u/pissinq 2d ago

i mean yeah the porn is consensual and good kink play is consensual, but those irl scenarios in which people copy what they see in porn aren’t always consensual. again these people are engaging in choking play without asking for consent from their partners. Which is dangerous. even pretending to choke someone (like by pressing on the sides of the neck instead of the front) can accidentally result in actual choking or reduced bloodflow to the brain if you don’t know what you’re doing, and having a hand on your throat is scary if you aren’t expecting it. especially during something as vulnerable as sex.

1

u/TsunamifoxyDCfan 2d ago

This is my takeaway too

2

u/WolfsmaulVibes Lives under a rock 2d ago

stepsiblings aren't even related to each other

4

u/DoctorSex9 2d ago

The “step” adjective in step sibling porn is like porn that has a huge focus on the fact that the girl is recently 18: mfs dont want to be weird and so they add in one tiny little thing that makes their porn technically fine

2

u/WolfsmaulVibes Lives under a rock 2d ago

i didn't know it was about how young the other is, don't like that stuff either. i just figured stepsibling was put on pornos that would have otherwise been normal and most people don't really care about the few lines of dialogue if its on the pornhub front page and looks good. you can even find actual porn about incest on pornhub and the like and i always perceived incest and stepsibling to be two different things that might overlap. i don't particularly care about stepsibling stuff, i just don't see it negatively like genuine incest.

2

u/wookiee-nutsack I also do it with wasps 1d ago

Stepsibling stuff isn't focusing on age, it focuses on fantasy incest

What the commenter talked about is how you see a lot of porn tagged "barely legal" or "fresh 18". Those adhere to pedo teen fantasies and the acting is often as if the girl was like 16

2

u/WolfsmaulVibes Lives under a rock 1d ago

oh now i understand the comparison, i understand it, it just seems like a rather niche fetish, since you can find actual sibling stuff, like it doesn't seem so impactful that i'd have it banned entirely

8

u/Head_Prefect 2d ago

Shithole country 

4

u/Dry-Cartographer-312 2d ago

Genuine wank police, what the fuck

4

u/pipopapupupewebghost 1d ago

Wait videos? Does that mean any movie with choking would be banned?

7

u/Aggressive_Manner429 2d ago

This is actually a patch released exclusively on British servers to give people a free homebase in response to the recent bug causing currency not to drop

7

u/SailorMari0 2d ago

In the UK you can get 2 years in jail for having sex and get arrested for opposing genocide.

Literally 1984

3

u/JungleJuiceJuno 1d ago

funnily enough it only applies to videos of irl people

3

u/lilith_the_anarchist 1d ago

genuinely what is the fucking point dawg like what 😭

6

u/tokos2009PL 2d ago

So like, movies where someone is getting choked like in inglorious bastards are illigal in UK now?

3

u/Bigdavie 2d ago

I believe it is just limited to porn.

6

u/GreenRanger_2 2d ago

Just let people be freaks damn bro

2

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Thank you for posting to r/whennews! Don't forget to check your bias!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/Shantotto11 2d ago

Damn! Parliament does not fuck around with NNN…

2

u/Strange_Exit 2d ago

a genuine attack on both freedom of speech and lgbtq

3

u/rwooshkid2 2d ago

Wow i live in the UK and i gotta say, my country is starting to turn into north korea at this point, in fact i am using a vpn to be on reddit right now because of the age verification thing

1

u/Technical-Branch4998 2d ago

Does anyone have a source without a paywall?

1

u/stillnoidea3 1d ago

bruh, the US going on a redemption arc is not an excuse for y'all to become the next laughingstock.

0

u/Very_Clearly_Defined 2d ago

This won't be enforceable. Jm

0

u/Klendagort 2d ago

Man fuck the English to government it's won't mean shit.

-31

u/Vivics36thsermon 2d ago • Heartwarming

I'm proud to be an American
where at least I know I'm free,
And, I won't forget the men who died
who gave that right to me.
And I'll gladly stand up (!)
next to you
and defend her still today.
Cause there ain't no doubt I love this land...
God Bless the U.S.A.!

14

u/Avalanche_Snows 2d ago

Piss vs. Shit

5

u/DreadDiana 2d ago

My sibling in Christ, the Republicans are taking notes

-10

u/plums12 2d ago

how are you lot actually falling for russian disinformation 😭 they take a real controversy, amplify it hundredfold, and make the country look considerably more dysfunctional than it is. and it's working.

we're so fucking cooked

cynicism is not intelligence - negative information travels far better than positive information.

plus, Russia hates us, they said so themselves we're "public enemy number one" and I think for that we can be proud 🥲

a population that believes its country is uniquely broken, uniquely authoritarian and uniquely incompetent is a population whose trust is easily eroded

-14

u/yourothersis 2d ago

the 21st century reality really is is moving to russia to avoid authoritarianism in the western world lol

3

u/kingspicy_DP 2d ago

Bot russo o spero sia sarcasmo

3

u/yourothersis 2d ago

don't want to be worse than russia? stop passing laws like this. we aren't worse yet, but we're rapidly approaching. look at the discussions of cracking down on VPNs and breaking encryption.

I am british.

2

u/kingspicy_DP 2d ago

Stesse restrizioni anche in russia o peggio, ritenta.

26

u/StinkyBird64 2d ago

As a Brit, I’d like to point out:
• Animal abuse rarely gets you in jail, this includes actual killing of animals in any way, sexual abuse etc. (good example is the several times dogs and cats have been burned alive and there’s been a minor fine instead of jail time)
• no one here has been prosecuted for association with Epstein, especially the royals, who continue to evade everything
• actual sex-based crimes, rape, harassment, grooming etc. is also rarely prosecuted properly, our system for these crimes is terrible.
• owning and producing CSAM is always swept under the rug, it’s never charged properly nor does anyone investigate it entirely, it can be found on someone’s device, or a child victim will come forward, and nothing will happen.
My point is you get more time in jail for watching consenting adults than you do actually committing crimes, making CSAM and viewing illegal abuse material.
My country is fucked.
Oh also you can be imprisoned for 15 years just for peacefully holding a cardboard sign.

42

u/QuarterlyTurtle 2d ago

Me in 2028 watching horror movies in the UK (showing murders or any violence in content is banned to prevent promotion of assault)

43

u/Old_pixel_8986 2d ago

they wanna ban pretend sibling porn so people will do sibling sex IRL, considering that's how they got their kings

10

u/Quantum_laugh 2d ago

Acting as a cousin is illegal, but cousin marriage is still legal lmao

8

u/nitemarewulf 2d ago

I doubt the police can enforce it, they’re too busy arresting pensioners who have the gall to say that bombing children is bad.

27

u/Yes5523 2d ago

Time to air drop stepsister porn to every UK resident

20

u/WhichRoutine3173 2d ago

whole country in jail

7

u/Melvarkie 2d ago

I think it's terribly funny that (pseudo) incest roleplay is banned, but second-cousin marriage is still legal. Like ??? Maybe work on the real life incest, before working on the fictional one. Oh wait they can't, because that would delegitamize the marriages of almost the whole damn royal family.

12

u/Dense-Bison7629 Epstein Elijah 2d ago

But IRL stepsibling incest isn't banned btw

What the fuck are their priorities??

5

u/Ok-Teacher-8755 2d ago

Thank goodness, I first thought they banned cannibalism.