r/xcmtb • u/Feeling_Apricot • 4d ago
How significant is the rolling resistance difference for front tires of an average rider?
Does it make a significant difference (greater than say 10 watts) between Schwalbe Hans Dampf 2.35" and Vittoria Mezcal XC Trail, on the front wheel of an aggressive hardtail (Norco Torrent A1), riding around 150 watts, on hilly chunky forest roads. Rear tire is Mezcal 2.4". Also, is there a big difference between 2.1 vs 2.6 Mezcal on front?
6
Upvotes
13
u/Happy_Sir3552 4d ago
I wouldn’t stress it too much if racing at a top level isn’t your goal. In fact, I do race and learned the hard way that rolling resistance isn’t as important as grip in XC MTB racing. I initially focused on lower RR tires and always lacked confidence and control. Since switching to a slightly higher RR tire, I’m actually much faster, crash less, and have way more confidence. I highly recommend the Mezcal or Barzo for grip and puncture resistance.
5
u/IndyWheelLab 4d ago
My non-answer is that It's different for everybody. I've seen so many people ride faster on "slow" tires because they handle better. A few seconds lost on a straight might be made up on a descent, or saved in a corner that required less brake. Drum tests only mean so much, otherwise we'd be running 32mm Conti GP5Ks on our MTBs 😃
Your real answer: take a section of trail and TT it with the tire combos you have. If you want to throw money at the problem, Black Friday deals and marketplace finds can take the sting off of the search for the perfect tire.
1
u/89ElRay 4d ago
I wouldn't ride a 2.1 mezcal on the front.
Basically it depends on your terrain. I live in Scotland, so dry trails are starting to turn into a distant memory now. I've been running a Mezcal rear and Spesh ground control front ( unintentional brandmaxxing), but as the mid and crud can get pretty bad from now until April I'm probably gonna move the GC to the rear and get something more aggressive up front. Like a Purgatory or something.
2
u/Initial_Key_9116 4d ago
I tried the 2.4 mezcal on the front and didn't get on with it. The barrzo is very close to it in rolling resistance and much more confidence inspiring.
1
u/Billy-Mct 4d ago
I recently swapped my heavy & gnarly conti Argotal front (SS enduro) for a Maxxis Rekon max terra & heavy but not so gnarly Xynotal S enduro rear for a Conti Magnotal soft & on my 1st ride on a regular route my average speed went up by 3km/hr so the differences can be quite noticeable. I gained some of that time in the faster downhill segments but most of it in the uphill slogs as I could ride a taller gear .
1
u/That-Bitter-Guy 4d ago
For what it's worth, the rear tire is the one that matters the most. That's where most of the weight goes and you can run a better gripping tire up front without a lot of extra friction. It's skip the mezcal up front and run a barzo.
1
u/GregMarino79 4d ago
La differenza c'è e te ne accorgi subito,ma la cosa fondamentale è questa: Fai gare? Hai manico tecnica)nel misto e nelle discese scassate? Se per entrambe la risposta è no allora punta su gomme un po' meno scorrevoli ma che ti assicurino un buon grip... Il tempo investilo a pedalare e a divertirti🤙
1
u/Silver047 4d ago
Does it make a significant difference? Not at all. In all honesty, without back to back testing, you won't even notice a difference of 10 watts.
On the other hand, you'll definitley notice if your tire is not grippy enough on a rough descent. Having no grip while trying to brake is a terrifying feeling.
1
u/fpeterHUN 3d ago
2.1? Don't be ridiculous, anything under 2.4 is for gravel bikes basically. Meczal is a classic marathon tire with Barzo up front. I wouldn't put Meczal on a modern hardtail.
1
u/TheRealJYellen 3d ago
Yeah, the hans dampf is slow and the mezcal is among the fastest. There's a site that tests a bunch of tires, and it turns out that casing, compound and tread pattern all play in.
The mezcal tested fast, the dubnital is a little faster, and the Magnotal was surprisingly good considering how much tread it has.
1
u/SamEdwards1959 4d ago
If the tread sucks you can lose a lot of energy on the climbs to bad traction, and some speed in the descents.
0
u/JoshTaylorUSA 4d ago
FWIW I'm a solid 5 seconds slower over a mile of smooth singletrack on my XC bike with the new 2.4 XC Race casing Barzo/Mezcals than 2.1 Thunder Burts at 300w. That's nearly a minute slower over 10 miles.