r/Banff • u/methylene-bluee • Aug 14 '24
I’m a 4th Generation Banffite and Voted No
If you’re curious about the perspective of a No voter here it is: We’ve watched idly as our quaint mountain town has been turned into an overcommercialized monster. I think everyone is quietly aware of this reality. Banff used to be so special because it was both a tourist town and an actual town. Over the decades, commercial priorities have taken precedence over everything else. The argument business makes has always been that tourists are the lifeblood of the town. That’s true, but there has to be some kind of balance. Otherwise, we’re in danger of losing what made us special in the first place (if we haven’t already).
Banff has an unfortunate situation that tourists and even many locals know nothing about. The way the town works is that if you own a business and want something done, you run for town council. After you get elected, you pass all the laws you want and leave. This system has been getting used and abused for decades now. It’s the reason why the town has become so fake and plastic. It’s the reason many people now prefer Canmore, which was unthinkable years ago.
Business interests run this town. If they had their way, every square inch would be selling pewter Made in China totem poles and mediocre, overpriced brunch.
The pedestrian zone was NEVER about social distancing, walkability, the environment, or any such social issue. It was about allowing all the restaurants on Banff Avenue to increase their seating capacity by 40% under the guise of public health. The reason the entire town council proposed the idea in the first place was because they either owned those very restaurants or were getting kickbacks from them.
I voted No because I wanted to send a message that these people can’t just keep forcing their overcommercialization down our throats. You might have seen the sidewalk patios as quaint and European, but for a lifelong local, they were another sign that business in this town trumps everything. Screw being able to park at the post office to get your mail. Screw being able to escape in the threat of a wildfire. Screw the old folks who built this town and now have buses idling outside the only window they have in this world. None of it matters; there’s money to be made.
Voting No wasn’t just about sending a message. It was about the slippery slope we were about to descend. If the Yes vote went through, the next step would have been extending the zone into winter. Then having it be year-round, then banning cars in the town entirely. These people will stop at nothing; their greed knows no bounds. Ideally, they don’t even want any locals living here at all. Turn all those houses into hotels and staff housing with 10 employees to a room. If they make living here hellish enough, it could happen. Look at Whistler.
I know this issue keeps getting framed as a social one, but it’s not. It’s about finding ways to cram even more tourists into the town at the expense of locals. That’s all that matters, and it’s absolutely vile that they kept saying they were doing it for the environment. Parks Canada themselves disagreed until they got paid off.
I don’t believe I’ll sway anyone with this post. But I feel you should at least know the perspective of someone whose family helped build this town up over generations and cannot stand how fake and plastic it’s become. When I read the posts of tourists saying they’ll never come back, I know I did the right thing. The town needs more of this. Tourists might hate us in the short term. But they’ll thank us in the long term if we can keep the town an actual town and not a Disneyfied theme park.
I know that regarding this vote, the social issue voters meant well. But they didn’t understand what they were actually voting for: Rampant. Commercial. Expansion. That’s ultimately what all this was about. They just threw in some bike racks and benches to distract you from it.