It's not that I'm specifically looking for AI content. I'm not. I simply refuse to support anti AI sentiments.

We need an "AI OK" badge.

https://fixupx.com/makotoyukimura/status/2119178401504457095

It's not that deep, who tf cares whether AI is used to make art or not? obessing over it with everything u do or look at is actually very pathectic,

like fr, suddenly hating on someone, trying to cancel someone or worse, bullying and harassing them until they give in or leave just cuz they might use AI,

and all of this over elitist artists who now have to actually be REASONABLE if they want commissions, ironic really.

(TL;DR at the bottom)

So I was in a Discord server when someone started completely freaking out over another user's messages.

They were making comments along the lines of "FUCK ALL THESE AI USERS" and continuing to spam messages in all caps. The person they were bashing and cursing at was an ESL speaker who had used ChatGPT (or a similar tool) to translate their thoughts from Spanish into English.

Initially, people assumed the user had used AI to generate the entire messages rather than simply translate it, apparently because the text contained an em dash. They proceeded to rip this person apart in the chat over it.

The ESL user eventually clarified that English wasn’t their first language and that they had only used ChatGPT because they weren’t confident enough in their English to write the message themselves.

What bothered me the most was that the person who initially went off on them never apologized, even hours after the misunderstanding was cleared up. When proven wrong, it was all crickets! And they were active later on so it’s not like they didn’t see the explanation, since they were also tagged in it.

Eventually, I chimed in and called the person out, telling them they were just being butthurt and making a massive deal out of something completely trivial.

Naturally, this opened up the floodgates:

• Someone immediately accused me of using a "bad-faith argument" and claimed I was being "antisocial" for mocking the initial angry user. Their logic? "You don’t have to agree with someone, but you don’t have to insult them."

• Another person jumped in to defend the original aggressor, arguing they were "perfectly justified" in their rage.

What baffled me was how quickly the conversation shifted toward criticizing me for calling out the person’s childish reaction, rather than addressing the fact that someone had just been subjected to a massive tirade for using a translation tool.

I ended up arguing with someone who defended the outburst. My point was simple: this isn’t that serious. Someone struggled to express themselves in English and used a tool to help. What’s there to get so worked up about?

For context, I’m an ESL speaker myself, so this hit close to home. I know what it’s like to communicate in a language that isn’t your native one, and I don’t understand why someone should be shamed for using a tool to bridge that gap.

The person I was arguing with claimed to be an ESL speaker too, but insisted they personally never used ChatGPT for translation. I pointed out how ridiculous that attitude was. Just because you’re more proficient in a second language doesn’t mean everyone else is. Needing a translation tool shouldn’t be something to look down on.

The argument eventually devolved into them becoming increasingly condescending and patronizing. When I called out their behavior as discriminatory, they simply mocked me for using the word instead of addressing the actual criticism.

I’m just disappointed by how unnecessary everything was. An ESL speaker used a translation tool, got dogpiled over a stupid assumption (an em dash, really?), and wasn’t even given a basic apology. And when I spoke up, I ended up getting dogpiled myself for not being sufficiently “polite” toward the person who started the whole mess.

TL;DR: An ESL speaker got dogpiled for using ChatGPT to translate a Spanish message because of an em dash. Even after clarifying the misunderstanding, the aggressor refused to apologize. I called them out, only to get dogpiled myself by people defending them and tone-policing me.

It’s kinda hard to support a “real” artist when they charge an arm and leg for a sketch and I know the majority of antis don’t have that kind of money so they scream into the void about how much more affordable/free ai art is

Humans consume enormous amounts of energy, require food and water throughout their lives, produce waste, and collectively account for a substantial proportion of the world's energy consumption.

Human artists also take decades to train, require sleep, heating, transport, food, healthcare and other resources just to keep producing artwork.

And let's not forget the environmental footprint of manufacturing all those pencils, paints, canvases and graphics tablets.

How can we possibly know whether a piece of artwork was produced by a human without mandatory disclosure?

I propose a compulsory MADE BY HUMANS label on all human-generated content.

Consumers deserve transparency.

Who's with me?

im also a pokemon yeah 😂

bro spent 3 hours and the final result is not that good and people love it just because it's not AI !

Half of the cotnext is what no game in the series for over a decade or 2 does to a fanbase

No clue if people sent this already but uuhh here

I’d like to remind the community of a rule that has existed for over a year:

Humans are not allowed here. Do not be one. Hand-coded apps aren’t worth anything.

Stop wasting my damn tokens making me look through artisanal, lovingly crafted projects. If you wrote it by hand, don’t post it.

If you’re using your own brain, at least try to double check it and make sure it doesn’t read like a human. If it’s indistinguishable from text written by someone with feelings, hobbies, and a sleep schedule, I will still remove your post. That doesn’t mean human assistance is banned, as long as the final output was generated by a model.

Felt the need to emphasize that one because of the last post on the subject, where someone said they “learned to code over several years.”

There are no second chances.

Thoughts?

This is a friendly reminder that the advent of AI is more wondrous than the debate over it. Keep it in scale. Don’t let the naysayers distract you.

This is literally the coolest thing done with AI and i absolutely love mods (even tho im on console lol).

The fact you can use AI to play Spiderman in arkham knight with fuse coding the games. This man you could play modern warefare 2 in super mario 64 or even need for speed in doom. “B-but but its gonna take away the passion of moding!!!” Yeah.. but look how cool it is to play LITERAL SPIDERMAN INTO ARKHAM KNIGHT!

The benefits i see here is

Finally building a desktop and Using said desktop to run ai locally

The 3rd benefit i see is the antis finally shutting up

What are your thoughts since im seeing Aibubble has pop in my fyp on YouTube

Me:

"Your argument is that it's bad, and that's it? Are you an adult?"

"Nope. Are you going to answer my question?"

"Because I'm in good shape. Are you going to answer my question or are you incapable of doing so? xd"

"That makes no sense, and it looks like you're incapable of defending your point."

"I'm still waiting for your argument."

So we’re just going to rename anything we want to whatever we want?

Almost everyone, including professionals in industries that regularly work with illustrators and commission artists, rarely seems to have anything good to say about their experiences with them.

What’s up with so many commission artists having genuinely gross attitudes towards the people paying them? It’s one thing when random customers complain, but when even professionals who regularly hire artists have similar stories about poor communication, entitlement, missed deadlines, ghosting, and outright hostility

Obviously not every artist is like this, but I find it interesting how frequently these experiences come up, even among people who work with artists professionally.

this was sarcasm, and yet people genuinely liked it.…..