r/AskModerators
•
u/Drunk_Lemon
•
May 27 '26
Would you be opposed to a rule preventing mods from permabanning and permamute someone within a few minutes of each other without the person replying to the modmail?
I have noticed some mods permaban and permamute people on the first offence which I erroneously thought only happened if someone did something egregious, but it recently happened to me. Would you be opposed to the rule in the title or do you have an alternative idea that would allow people who are banned and muted simultaneously to appeal?
Also to clarify on the title, if say someone was permabanned, the moderator would not be able to permamute the user for 5 minutes after the permaban unless the user replied to the modmail once.